Claude Sonnet 5.5

AnthropicCurrent

Input price
$2.00
Per 1 million tokens (USD)
Output price
$10.00
Per 1 million tokens (USD)
Effort levels
5total
Default: High
Benchmark results
62total
Benchmark types: 24

Model information

API model ID
claude-sonnet-5-5
release date
2026-09-28
effort
Low / Med / High (default) / Xhigh / Max
Effort source
Based on Anthropic effort documentation (platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/effort).
Claude Code
available
Codex
unavailable
Availability notes
`sonnet` resolves to Sonnet 5.5 on Anthropic API (as of v2.1.284). Claude Code default effort is medium (API default is high). Codex's official model list (learn.chatgpt.com/docs/models) contains only OpenAI models, so codex is false (connections via a custom provider are not counted as official options).
Availability source
https://code.claude.com/docs/en/model-config

Price (USD per 1 million tokens)

Prices do not vary by effort; token consumption does.

input$2.00
output$10.00
cache read$0.10
cache write$2.50

cacheWritePerMTok is for a 5-minute cache write. 1h write $4. cache read 0.05x.

Claude Sonnet 5.5 | $2 / MTok | $2.50 / MTok | $4 / MTok | $0.10 / MTok | $10 / MTok

Source: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing

Benchmark results

BenchmarkeffortScoreSource cost (metric)measured/reported bysourceConditions and extraction method
Terminal-Bench 4.0LowLow20.0%$0.76Cost per attemptAnthropicIntroducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Terminal-Bench 4.0 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptTerminal-Bench 4.0 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Low: 20.0% $0.76"
Terminal-Bench 4.0LowLow20.0%$0.62Cost per attemptAnthropicIntroducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Terminal-Bench 4.0 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); cost series calculated using cache read at $0.10/MTok; the same figure also has a series calculated using cache read at $0.20/MTok, and the cost of that point is $0.79transcribed from text
Source excerptTerminal-Bench 4.0 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 ($0.10 cache reads) · Low: 20.0% $0.62"
Terminal-Bench 4.0MedMed28.8%$0.83Cost per attemptAnthropicIntroducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Terminal-Bench 4.0 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptTerminal-Bench 4.0 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Med: 28.8% $0.83"
Terminal-Bench 4.0MedMed28.8%$0.68Cost per attemptAnthropicIntroducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Terminal-Bench 4.0 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); cost series calculated using cache read at $0.10/MTok; the same figure also has a series calculated using cache read at $0.20/MTok, and the cost of that point is $0.86transcribed from text
Source excerptTerminal-Bench 4.0 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 ($0.10 cache reads) · Med: 28.8% $0.68"
Terminal-Bench 4.0High (default)High43.0%$1.94Cost per attemptAnthropicIntroducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Terminal-Bench 4.0 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptTerminal-Bench 4.0 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · High: 43.0% $1.94"
Terminal-Bench 4.0High (default)High43.0%$1.46Cost per attemptAnthropicIntroducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Terminal-Bench 4.0 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); cost series calculated using cache read at $0.10/MTok; the same figure also has a series calculated using cache read at $0.20/MTok, and the cost of that point is $1.97transcribed from text
Source excerptTerminal-Bench 4.0 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 ($0.10 cache reads) · High: 43.0% $1.46"
Terminal-Bench 4.0XhighXhigh61.5%$5.30Cost per attemptAnthropicIntroducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Terminal-Bench 4.0 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptTerminal-Bench 4.0 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Xhigh: 61.5% $5.30"
Terminal-Bench 4.0XhighXhigh61.5%$4.34Cost per attemptAnthropicIntroducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Terminal-Bench 4.0 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); cost series calculated using cache read at $0.10/MTok; the same figure also has a series calculated using cache read at $0.20/MTok, and the cost of that point is $5.83transcribed from text
Source excerptTerminal-Bench 4.0 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 ($0.10 cache reads) · Xhigh: 61.5% $4.34"
Terminal-Bench 4.0MaxMax70.6%$12.54Cost per attemptAnthropicIntroducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Terminal-Bench 4.0 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptTerminal-Bench 4.0 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Max: 70.6% $12.54"
Terminal-Bench 4.0MaxMax70.6%$10.44Cost per attemptAnthropicIntroducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Terminal-Bench 4.0 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); cost series calculated using cache read at $0.10/MTok; the same figure also has a series calculated using cache read at $0.20/MTok, and the cost of that point is $14.15transcribed from text
Source excerptTerminal-Bench 4.0 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 ($0.10 cache reads) · Max: 70.6% $10.44"
Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1MaxMax59.9%—AnthropicClaude Sonnet 5.5 System Cardofficial · Retrieved 2026-11-14Vendor-reported value. Claude Code --bare, max, 70 tasks. No internet; safeguards enabled. No fallback was triggered. Cost not stated.transcribed from text
Source excerpt59.9%Location §8.6 “Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1”, body text, own model score
FrontierCode v1.1(main set)LowLow29.3%$0.19Cost per taskAnthropicIntroducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "FrontierCode v1.1, main set / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptFrontierCode v1.1, main set — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Low: 29.3% $0.19"
FrontierCode v1.1(main set)MedMed36.5%$0.24Cost per taskAnthropicIntroducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "FrontierCode v1.1, main set / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptFrontierCode v1.1, main set — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Med: 36.5% $0.24"
FrontierCode v1.1(main set)High (default)High49.4%$0.42Cost per taskAnthropicIntroducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "FrontierCode v1.1, main set / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptFrontierCode v1.1, main set — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · High: 49.4% $0.42"
FrontierCode v1.1(main set)XhighXhigh52.1%$1.59Cost per taskAnthropicIntroducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "FrontierCode v1.1, main set / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptFrontierCode v1.1, main set — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Xhigh: 52.1% $1.59"
FrontierCode v1.1(main set)XhighXhigh52.1%—AnthropicIntroducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. table note: see the Haiku 5.5 System Card (effort not stated); Sonnet 5.5 is in the "For reference" columntranscribed from table
Source excerpt52.1%Location Table, FrontierCode v1.1 (Main) row: 52.1
FrontierCode v1.1(main set)MaxMax46.2%$20.78Cost per taskAnthropicIntroducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "FrontierCode v1.1, main set / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptFrontierCode v1.1, main set — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Max: 46.2% $20.78"
FrontierSWE 2MaxMax61.9%—ProximalClaude Sonnet 5.5 System Cardofficial · Retrieved 2026-11-14Vendor-reported value. Run by Proximal in its own agent harness. max, 34 tasks, averaged over 5 trials per task. Cost not stated.transcribed from text
Source excerpt61.9%Location §8.7 “FrontierSWE v2”, body text, own model score
CursorBench 4.0LowLow35.8%$0.50Cost per taskAnthropicIntroducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "CursorBench 4.0 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptCursorBench 4.0 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Low: 35.8% $0.50"
CursorBench 4.0MedMed39.2%$0.70Cost per taskAnthropicIntroducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "CursorBench 4.0 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptCursorBench 4.0 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Med: 39.2% $0.70"
CursorBench 4.0High (default)High47.8%$1.67Cost per taskAnthropicIntroducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "CursorBench 4.0 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptCursorBench 4.0 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · High: 47.8% $1.67"
CursorBench 4.0XhighXhigh53.1%$3.88Cost per taskAnthropicIntroducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "CursorBench 4.0 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptCursorBench 4.0 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Xhigh: 53.1% $3.88"
CursorBench 4.0MaxMax55.5%$9.67Cost per taskAnthropicIntroducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "CursorBench 4.0 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptCursorBench 4.0 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Max: 55.5% $9.67"
GDPval-AA v2.1not statednot stated1,844—Artificial AnalysisIntroducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. table note: For details on how we run our evaluations, see the Sonnet 5.5 System Card (only efforts explicitly stated in the table); footnote 3: run by Artificial Analysis on a pre-release deployment (structured outputs bug, now fixed)transcribed from table
Source excerpt1844Location Table, GDPval-AA v2.1 row: 1844
GDPval-AA v2.1LowLow1,179$0.22Cost per taskAnthropicIntroducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "GDPval-AA v2.1 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptGDPval-AA v2.1 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Low: 1179.0 $0.22"
GDPval-AA v2.1MedMed1,324$0.27Cost per taskAnthropicIntroducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "GDPval-AA v2.1 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptGDPval-AA v2.1 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Med: 1324.0 $0.27"
GDPval-AA v2.1High (default)High1,551$0.62Cost per taskAnthropicIntroducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "GDPval-AA v2.1 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptGDPval-AA v2.1 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · High: 1551.0 $0.62"
GDPval-AA v2.1XhighXhigh1,731$1.88Cost per taskAnthropicIntroducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "GDPval-AA v2.1 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptGDPval-AA v2.1 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Xhigh: 1731.0 $1.88"
GDPval-AA v2.1MaxMax1,840$6.78Cost per taskAnthropicIntroducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "GDPval-AA v2.1 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptGDPval-AA v2.1 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Max: 1840.0 $6.78"
AA-Briefcase v1.1(Elo)not statednot stated1,824—AnthropicIntroducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. table note: see the Haiku 5.5 System Card (effort not stated); Sonnet 5.5 is in the "For reference" columntranscribed from table
Source excerpt1824Location Table, AA-Briefcase v1.1 (Elo) row: 1824
AA-Briefcase v1.1(Elo)LowLow1,264$0.87Cost per taskAnthropicIntroducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "AA-Briefcase v1.1 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptAA-Briefcase v1.1 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Low: 1264.0 $0.87"
AA-Briefcase v1.1(Elo)MedMed1,461$1.64Cost per taskAnthropicIntroducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "AA-Briefcase v1.1 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptAA-Briefcase v1.1 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Med: 1461.0 $1.64"
AA-Briefcase v1.1(Elo)High (default)High1,634$3.95Cost per taskAnthropicIntroducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "AA-Briefcase v1.1 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptAA-Briefcase v1.1 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · High: 1634.0 $3.95"
AA-Briefcase v1.1(Elo)XhighXhigh1,746$9.63Cost per taskAnthropicIntroducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "AA-Briefcase v1.1 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptAA-Briefcase v1.1 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Xhigh: 1746.0 $9.63"
AA-Briefcase v1.1(Elo)MaxMax1,811$29.19Cost per taskAnthropicIntroducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "AA-Briefcase v1.1 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptAA-Briefcase v1.1 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Max: 1811.0 $29.19"
Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)not statednot stated64.5%—AnthropicIntroducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. table note: For details on how we run our evaluations, see the Sonnet 5.5 System Card (only efforts explicitly stated in the table)transcribed from table
Source excerpt64.5%Location Table, Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) row: 64.5
Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)not statednot stated64.5%—AnthropicIntroducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. table note: see the Haiku 5.5 System Card (effort not stated); Sonnet 5.5 is in the "For reference" columntranscribed from table
Source excerpt64.5%Location Table, Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) row: 64.5
Humanity's Last Exam (without tools)LowLow41.4%$0.03Cost per attemptAnthropicIntroducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Humanity’s Last Exam (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptHumanity’s Last Exam (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Low: 41.4% $0.03"
Humanity's Last Exam (without tools)MedMed43.2%$0.03Cost per attemptAnthropicIntroducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Humanity’s Last Exam (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptHumanity’s Last Exam (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Med: 43.2% $0.03"
Humanity's Last Exam (without tools)High (default)High47.9%$0.08Cost per attemptAnthropicIntroducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Humanity’s Last Exam (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptHumanity’s Last Exam (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · High: 47.9% $0.08"
Humanity's Last Exam (without tools)XhighXhigh53.0%$0.20Cost per attemptAnthropicIntroducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Humanity’s Last Exam (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptHumanity’s Last Exam (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Xhigh: 53.0% $0.20"
Humanity's Last Exam (without tools)MaxMax56.9%$0.89Cost per attemptAnthropicIntroducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Humanity’s Last Exam (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptHumanity’s Last Exam (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Max: 56.9% $0.89"
OSWorld 2.1(partial)not statednot stated80.1%—AnthropicIntroducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. table note: For details on how we run our evaluations, see the Sonnet 5.5 System Card (only efforts explicitly stated in the table)transcribed from table
Source excerpt80.1%Location Table, OSWorld 2.1 (partial) row: 80.1
OSWorld 2.1(offline subset)LowLow57.9%$0.68Cost per attemptAnthropicIntroducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "OSWorld 2.1 (offline subset) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptOSWorld 2.1 (offline subset) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Low: 57.9% $0.68"
OSWorld 2.1(offline subset)MedMed66.0%$0.93Cost per attemptAnthropicIntroducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "OSWorld 2.1 (offline subset) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptOSWorld 2.1 (offline subset) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Med: 66.0% $0.93"
OSWorld 2.1(offline subset)High (default)High73.2%$1.38Cost per attemptAnthropicIntroducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "OSWorld 2.1 (offline subset) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptOSWorld 2.1 (offline subset) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · High: 73.2% $1.38"
OSWorld 2.1(offline subset)XhighXhigh81.1%$2.22Cost per attemptAnthropicIntroducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "OSWorld 2.1 (offline subset) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptOSWorld 2.1 (offline subset) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Xhigh: 81.1% $2.22"
OSWorld 2.1(offline subset)MaxMax83.9%$5.73Cost per attemptAnthropicIntroducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "OSWorld 2.1 (offline subset) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from text
Source excerptOSWorld 2.1 (offline subset) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Max: 83.9% $5.73"
Chartography (with tools)MaxMax90.2%—AnthropicClaude Sonnet 5.5 System Cardofficial · Retrieved 2026-11-14Vendor-reported value. Run internally by Anthropic. adaptive thinking, max, with tools, averaged over 5 runs. The grader is Gemini 3.5 Flash. Cost not stated.transcribed from text
Source excerpt90.2%Location §8.13.1 “Chartography”, body text, own model with tools score
Chartography (without tools)not statednot stated61.6%—AnthropicIntroducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. table note: For details on how we run our evaluations, see the Sonnet 5.5 System Card (only efforts explicitly stated in the table)transcribed from table
Source excerpt61.6%Location Table, Chartography (no tools) row: 61.6
Chartography (without tools)not statednot stated61.6%—AnthropicIntroducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12Vendor-reported value. table note: see the Haiku 5.5 System Card (effort not stated); Sonnet 5.5 is in the "For reference" columntranscribed from table
Source excerpt61.6%Location Table, Chartography (no tools) row: 61.6
HealthBench Professional (length-adjusted score)MaxMax63—Artificial AnalysisClaude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2 System Cardofficial · Retrieved 2026-11-14Vendor-reported value. Independently run by Artificial Analysis at Anthropic’s request. max, length-adjusted score, GPT-5.4 low grader. fallback enabled. Not comparable with internal runs in earlier Claude system cards (Opus 4.8 grader). Cost not stated.transcribed from text
Source excerpt63.0%Location §8.16.2 “HealthBench Professional (Artificial Analysis)”, body text, the model’s length-adjusted score in parentheses
GPQA DiamondMaxMax95.6%—Epoch AIEpoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, gpqa_diamond.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max)". effort is indicated by the suffix _max in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12.transcribed from table
Source excerptgpqa_diamond.csv: Model version=claude-sonnet-5-5_max, Best score (across scorers)=0.9558080808080808, stderr=0.013710320714521202, Started at=2026-09-29T15:15:14.000Z
FrontierMath Tiers 1-3(v2)MaxMax88.8%—Epoch AIEpoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, frontiermath_tiers_1_3_v2.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max)". effort is indicated by the suffix _max in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12.transcribed from table
Source excerptfrontiermath_tiers_1_3_v2.csv: Model version=claude-sonnet-5-5_max, Best score (across scorers)=0.887719298245614, stderr=0.018734030360524248, Started at=2026-09-29T15:15:14.000Z
FrontierMath Tier 4(v2)MaxMax80.5%—Epoch AIEpoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, frontiermath_tier_4_v2.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max)". effort is indicated by the suffix _max in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12.transcribed from table
Source excerptfrontiermath_tier_4_v2.csv: Model version=claude-sonnet-5-5_max, Best score (across scorers)=0.8048780487804879, stderr=0.06265967111543964, Started at=2026-09-29T15:15:14.000Z
OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025MaxMax100.0%—Epoch AIEpoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, otis_mock_aime_2024_2025.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max)". effort is indicated by the suffix _max in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12.transcribed from table
Source excerptotis_mock_aime_2024_2025.csv: Model version=claude-sonnet-5-5_max, Best score (across scorers)=1.0, stderr=0.0, Started at=2026-09-29T15:15:14.000Z
SimpleQA VerifiedMaxMax46.5%—Epoch AIEpoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, simpleqa_verified.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max)". effort is indicated by the suffix _max in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12.transcribed from table
Source excerptsimpleqa_verified.csv: Model version=claude-sonnet-5-5_max, Best score (across scorers)=0.465, stderr=0.015780495050030086, Started at=2026-09-29T15:15:14.000Z
Chess Puzzles(Epoch AI)MaxMax59.0%—Epoch AIEpoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, chess_puzzles.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max)". effort is indicated by the suffix _max in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12.transcribed from table
Source excerptchess_puzzles.csv: Model version=claude-sonnet-5-5_max, Best score (across scorers)=0.59, stderr=0.04943110704237103, Started at=2026-10-13T13:00:38.000Z
MirrorCodeMaxMax97.8%—Epoch AIEpoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, mirrorcode.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max)". effort is indicated by the suffix _max in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12.transcribed from table
Source excerptmirrorcode.csv: Model version=claude-sonnet-5-5_max, Best score (across scorers)=0.9777777777777777, stderr=0.015141892085983264, Started at=2026-10-05T09:05:15.000Z
Epoch Capabilities Index(ECI)not statednot stated166.56—Epoch AIEpoch AI, epoch_capabilities_index/eci_scores.csv (CC BY 4.0)third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12A per-model metric that combines results across multiple benchmarks and multiple efforts (not per effort). Calculated by Epoch AI.transcribed from table
Source excerpteci_scores.csv: Model=Claude Sonnet 5.5, eci=166.56, eci_ci_low=163.76, eci_ci_high=169.58
LMArena Text (style control, overall)XhighXhigh1,473—LMArenalmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset text_style_control/latest-00000-of-00001.parquet (CC BY 4.0)third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12Human head-to-head votes (Bradley-Terry). Source label "Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xHigh)" (effort is in parentheses in the label). Release date 2026-11-09.transcribed from table
Source excerptmodel_name=Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xHigh), rating=1472.49, rating_lower=1466.3, rating_upper=1478.6, vote_count=13821, rank=46, category=overall, leaderboard_publish_date=2026-11-09
LMArena Text Coding (without style control)XhighXhigh1,500—LMArenalmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset text/latest-00000-of-00001.parquet (CC BY 4.0)third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12Human head-to-head votes (Bradley-Terry). Source label "Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xHigh)" (effort is in parentheses in the label). Release date 2026-11-09.transcribed from table
Source excerptmodel_name=Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xHigh), rating=1500.17, rating_lower=1488.9, rating_upper=1511.4, vote_count=3207, rank=25, category=coding, leaderboard_publish_date=2026-11-09

Related rankings

References