Claude Sonnet 5.5
- Input price
- $2.00
- Per 1 million tokens (USD)
- Output price
- $10.00
- Per 1 million tokens (USD)
- Effort levels
- 5total
- Default: High
- Benchmark results
- 62total
- Benchmark types: 24
Model information
- API model ID
- claude-sonnet-5-5
- release date
- 2026-09-28
- effort
- Low / Med / High (default) / Xhigh / Max
- Effort source
- Based on Anthropic effort documentation (platform.claude.com/docs/en/build-with-claude/effort).
- Claude Code
- available
- Codex
- unavailable
- Availability notes
- `sonnet` resolves to Sonnet 5.5 on Anthropic API (as of v2.1.284). Claude Code default effort is medium (API default is high). Codex's official model list (learn.chatgpt.com/docs/models) contains only OpenAI models, so codex is false (connections via a custom provider are not counted as official options).
- Availability source
- https://code.claude.com/docs/en/model-config
Price (USD per 1 million tokens)
Prices do not vary by effort; token consumption does.
| input | $2.00 |
|---|---|
| output | $10.00 |
| cache read | $0.10 |
| cache write | $2.50 |
cacheWritePerMTok is for a 5-minute cache write. 1h write $4. cache read 0.05x.
Claude Sonnet 5.5 | $2 / MTok | $2.50 / MTok | $4 / MTok | $0.10 / MTok | $10 / MTokSource: https://platform.claude.com/docs/en/about-claude/pricing
Benchmark results
| Benchmark | effort | Score | Source cost (metric) | measured/reported by | source | Conditions and extraction method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 4.0Low | Low | 20.0% | $0.76Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Terminal-Bench 4.0 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptTerminal-Bench 4.0 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Low: 20.0% $0.76" |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0Low | Low | 20.0% | $0.62Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Terminal-Bench 4.0 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); cost series calculated using cache read at $0.10/MTok; the same figure also has a series calculated using cache read at $0.20/MTok, and the cost of that point is $0.79transcribed from textSource excerptTerminal-Bench 4.0 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 ($0.10 cache reads) · Low: 20.0% $0.62" |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0Med | Med | 28.8% | $0.83Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Terminal-Bench 4.0 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptTerminal-Bench 4.0 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Med: 28.8% $0.83" |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0Med | Med | 28.8% | $0.68Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Terminal-Bench 4.0 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); cost series calculated using cache read at $0.10/MTok; the same figure also has a series calculated using cache read at $0.20/MTok, and the cost of that point is $0.86transcribed from textSource excerptTerminal-Bench 4.0 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 ($0.10 cache reads) · Med: 28.8% $0.68" |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0High (default) | High | 43.0% | $1.94Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Terminal-Bench 4.0 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptTerminal-Bench 4.0 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · High: 43.0% $1.94" |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0High (default) | High | 43.0% | $1.46Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Terminal-Bench 4.0 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); cost series calculated using cache read at $0.10/MTok; the same figure also has a series calculated using cache read at $0.20/MTok, and the cost of that point is $1.97transcribed from textSource excerptTerminal-Bench 4.0 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 ($0.10 cache reads) · High: 43.0% $1.46" |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0Xhigh | Xhigh | 61.5% | $5.30Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Terminal-Bench 4.0 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptTerminal-Bench 4.0 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Xhigh: 61.5% $5.30" |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0Xhigh | Xhigh | 61.5% | $4.34Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Terminal-Bench 4.0 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); cost series calculated using cache read at $0.10/MTok; the same figure also has a series calculated using cache read at $0.20/MTok, and the cost of that point is $5.83transcribed from textSource excerptTerminal-Bench 4.0 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 ($0.10 cache reads) · Xhigh: 61.5% $4.34" |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0Max | Max | 70.6% | $12.54Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Terminal-Bench 4.0 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptTerminal-Bench 4.0 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Max: 70.6% $12.54" |
| Terminal-Bench 4.0Max | Max | 70.6% | $10.44Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Terminal-Bench 4.0 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); cost series calculated using cache read at $0.10/MTok; the same figure also has a series calculated using cache read at $0.20/MTok, and the cost of that point is $14.15transcribed from textSource excerptTerminal-Bench 4.0 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 ($0.10 cache reads) · Max: 70.6% $10.44" |
| Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1Max | Max | 59.9% | — | Anthropic | Claude Sonnet 5.5 System Cardofficial · Retrieved 2026-11-14 | Vendor-reported value. Claude Code --bare, max, 70 tasks. No internet; safeguards enabled. No fallback was triggered. Cost not stated.transcribed from textSource excerpt59.9%Location §8.6 “Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1”, body text, own model score |
| FrontierCode v1.1(main set)Low | Low | 29.3% | $0.19Cost per task | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "FrontierCode v1.1, main set / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptFrontierCode v1.1, main set — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Low: 29.3% $0.19" |
| FrontierCode v1.1(main set)Med | Med | 36.5% | $0.24Cost per task | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "FrontierCode v1.1, main set / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptFrontierCode v1.1, main set — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Med: 36.5% $0.24" |
| FrontierCode v1.1(main set)High (default) | High | 49.4% | $0.42Cost per task | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "FrontierCode v1.1, main set / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptFrontierCode v1.1, main set — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · High: 49.4% $0.42" |
| FrontierCode v1.1(main set)Xhigh | Xhigh | 52.1% | $1.59Cost per task | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "FrontierCode v1.1, main set / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptFrontierCode v1.1, main set — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Xhigh: 52.1% $1.59" |
| FrontierCode v1.1(main set)Xhigh | Xhigh | 52.1% | — | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. table note: see the Haiku 5.5 System Card (effort not stated); Sonnet 5.5 is in the "For reference" columntranscribed from tableSource excerpt52.1%Location Table, FrontierCode v1.1 (Main) row: 52.1 |
| FrontierCode v1.1(main set)Max | Max | 46.2% | $20.78Cost per task | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "FrontierCode v1.1, main set / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptFrontierCode v1.1, main set — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Max: 46.2% $20.78" |
| FrontierSWE 2Max | Max | 61.9% | — | Proximal | Claude Sonnet 5.5 System Cardofficial · Retrieved 2026-11-14 | Vendor-reported value. Run by Proximal in its own agent harness. max, 34 tasks, averaged over 5 trials per task. Cost not stated.transcribed from textSource excerpt61.9%Location §8.7 “FrontierSWE v2”, body text, own model score |
| CursorBench 4.0Low | Low | 35.8% | $0.50Cost per task | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "CursorBench 4.0 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptCursorBench 4.0 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Low: 35.8% $0.50" |
| CursorBench 4.0Med | Med | 39.2% | $0.70Cost per task | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "CursorBench 4.0 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptCursorBench 4.0 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Med: 39.2% $0.70" |
| CursorBench 4.0High (default) | High | 47.8% | $1.67Cost per task | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "CursorBench 4.0 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptCursorBench 4.0 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · High: 47.8% $1.67" |
| CursorBench 4.0Xhigh | Xhigh | 53.1% | $3.88Cost per task | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "CursorBench 4.0 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptCursorBench 4.0 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Xhigh: 53.1% $3.88" |
| CursorBench 4.0Max | Max | 55.5% | $9.67Cost per task | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "CursorBench 4.0 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptCursorBench 4.0 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Max: 55.5% $9.67" |
| GDPval-AA v2.1not stated | not stated | 1,844 | — | Artificial Analysis | Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. table note: For details on how we run our evaluations, see the Sonnet 5.5 System Card (only efforts explicitly stated in the table); footnote 3: run by Artificial Analysis on a pre-release deployment (structured outputs bug, now fixed)transcribed from tableSource excerpt1844Location Table, GDPval-AA v2.1 row: 1844 |
| GDPval-AA v2.1Low | Low | 1,179 | $0.22Cost per task | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "GDPval-AA v2.1 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptGDPval-AA v2.1 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Low: 1179.0 $0.22" |
| GDPval-AA v2.1Med | Med | 1,324 | $0.27Cost per task | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "GDPval-AA v2.1 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptGDPval-AA v2.1 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Med: 1324.0 $0.27" |
| GDPval-AA v2.1High (default) | High | 1,551 | $0.62Cost per task | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "GDPval-AA v2.1 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptGDPval-AA v2.1 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · High: 1551.0 $0.62" |
| GDPval-AA v2.1Xhigh | Xhigh | 1,731 | $1.88Cost per task | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "GDPval-AA v2.1 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptGDPval-AA v2.1 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Xhigh: 1731.0 $1.88" |
| GDPval-AA v2.1Max | Max | 1,840 | $6.78Cost per task | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "GDPval-AA v2.1 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptGDPval-AA v2.1 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Max: 1840.0 $6.78" |
| AA-Briefcase v1.1(Elo)not stated | not stated | 1,824 | — | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. table note: see the Haiku 5.5 System Card (effort not stated); Sonnet 5.5 is in the "For reference" columntranscribed from tableSource excerpt1824Location Table, AA-Briefcase v1.1 (Elo) row: 1824 |
| AA-Briefcase v1.1(Elo)Low | Low | 1,264 | $0.87Cost per task | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "AA-Briefcase v1.1 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptAA-Briefcase v1.1 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Low: 1264.0 $0.87" |
| AA-Briefcase v1.1(Elo)Med | Med | 1,461 | $1.64Cost per task | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "AA-Briefcase v1.1 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptAA-Briefcase v1.1 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Med: 1461.0 $1.64" |
| AA-Briefcase v1.1(Elo)High (default) | High | 1,634 | $3.95Cost per task | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "AA-Briefcase v1.1 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptAA-Briefcase v1.1 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · High: 1634.0 $3.95" |
| AA-Briefcase v1.1(Elo)Xhigh | Xhigh | 1,746 | $9.63Cost per task | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "AA-Briefcase v1.1 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptAA-Briefcase v1.1 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Xhigh: 1746.0 $9.63" |
| AA-Briefcase v1.1(Elo)Max | Max | 1,811 | $29.19Cost per task | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "AA-Briefcase v1.1 / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptAA-Briefcase v1.1 — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Max: 1811.0 $29.19" |
| Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)not stated | not stated | 64.5% | — | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. table note: For details on how we run our evaluations, see the Sonnet 5.5 System Card (only efforts explicitly stated in the table)transcribed from tableSource excerpt64.5%Location Table, Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) row: 64.5 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (with tools)not stated | not stated | 64.5% | — | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. table note: see the Haiku 5.5 System Card (effort not stated); Sonnet 5.5 is in the "For reference" columntranscribed from tableSource excerpt64.5%Location Table, Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) row: 64.5 |
| Humanity's Last Exam (without tools)Low | Low | 41.4% | $0.03Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Humanity’s Last Exam (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptHumanity’s Last Exam (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Low: 41.4% $0.03" |
| Humanity's Last Exam (without tools)Med | Med | 43.2% | $0.03Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Humanity’s Last Exam (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptHumanity’s Last Exam (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Med: 43.2% $0.03" |
| Humanity's Last Exam (without tools)High (default) | High | 47.9% | $0.08Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Humanity’s Last Exam (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptHumanity’s Last Exam (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · High: 47.9% $0.08" |
| Humanity's Last Exam (without tools)Xhigh | Xhigh | 53.0% | $0.20Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Humanity’s Last Exam (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptHumanity’s Last Exam (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Xhigh: 53.0% $0.20" |
| Humanity's Last Exam (without tools)Max | Max | 56.9% | $0.89Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Humanity’s Last Exam (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptHumanity’s Last Exam (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Max: 56.9% $0.89" |
| OSWorld 2.1(partial)not stated | not stated | 80.1% | — | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. table note: For details on how we run our evaluations, see the Sonnet 5.5 System Card (only efforts explicitly stated in the table)transcribed from tableSource excerpt80.1%Location Table, OSWorld 2.1 (partial) row: 80.1 |
| OSWorld 2.1(offline subset)Low | Low | 57.9% | $0.68Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "OSWorld 2.1 (offline subset) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptOSWorld 2.1 (offline subset) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Low: 57.9% $0.68" |
| OSWorld 2.1(offline subset)Med | Med | 66.0% | $0.93Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "OSWorld 2.1 (offline subset) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptOSWorld 2.1 (offline subset) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Med: 66.0% $0.93" |
| OSWorld 2.1(offline subset)High (default) | High | 73.2% | $1.38Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "OSWorld 2.1 (offline subset) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptOSWorld 2.1 (offline subset) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · High: 73.2% $1.38" |
| OSWorld 2.1(offline subset)Xhigh | Xhigh | 81.1% | $2.22Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "OSWorld 2.1 (offline subset) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptOSWorld 2.1 (offline subset) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Xhigh: 81.1% $2.22" |
| OSWorld 2.1(offline subset)Max | Max | 83.9% | $5.73Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "OSWorld 2.1 (offline subset) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)transcribed from textSource excerptOSWorld 2.1 (offline subset) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Sonnet 5.5 · Max: 83.9% $5.73" |
| Chartography (with tools)Max | Max | 90.2% | — | Anthropic | Claude Sonnet 5.5 System Cardofficial · Retrieved 2026-11-14 | Vendor-reported value. Run internally by Anthropic. adaptive thinking, max, with tools, averaged over 5 runs. The grader is Gemini 3.5 Flash. Cost not stated.transcribed from textSource excerpt90.2%Location §8.13.1 “Chartography”, body text, own model with tools score |
| Chartography (without tools)not stated | not stated | 61.6% | — | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. table note: For details on how we run our evaluations, see the Sonnet 5.5 System Card (only efforts explicitly stated in the table)transcribed from tableSource excerpt61.6%Location Table, Chartography (no tools) row: 61.6 |
| Chartography (without tools)not stated | not stated | 61.6% | — | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5official · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. table note: see the Haiku 5.5 System Card (effort not stated); Sonnet 5.5 is in the "For reference" columntranscribed from tableSource excerpt61.6%Location Table, Chartography (no tools) row: 61.6 |
| HealthBench Professional (length-adjusted score)Max | Max | 63 | — | Artificial Analysis | Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2 System Cardofficial · Retrieved 2026-11-14 | Vendor-reported value. Independently run by Artificial Analysis at Anthropic’s request. max, length-adjusted score, GPT-5.4 low grader. fallback enabled. Not comparable with internal runs in earlier Claude system cards (Opus 4.8 grader). Cost not stated.transcribed from textSource excerpt63.0%Location §8.16.2 “HealthBench Professional (Artificial Analysis)”, body text, the model’s length-adjusted score in parentheses |
| GPQA DiamondMax | Max | 95.6% | — | Epoch AI | Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, gpqa_diamond.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max)". effort is indicated by the suffix _max in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12.transcribed from tableSource excerptgpqa_diamond.csv: Model version=claude-sonnet-5-5_max, Best score (across scorers)=0.9558080808080808, stderr=0.013710320714521202, Started at=2026-09-29T15:15:14.000Z |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3(v2)Max | Max | 88.8% | — | Epoch AI | Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, frontiermath_tiers_1_3_v2.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max)". effort is indicated by the suffix _max in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12.transcribed from tableSource excerptfrontiermath_tiers_1_3_v2.csv: Model version=claude-sonnet-5-5_max, Best score (across scorers)=0.887719298245614, stderr=0.018734030360524248, Started at=2026-09-29T15:15:14.000Z |
| FrontierMath Tier 4(v2)Max | Max | 80.5% | — | Epoch AI | Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, frontiermath_tier_4_v2.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max)". effort is indicated by the suffix _max in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12.transcribed from tableSource excerptfrontiermath_tier_4_v2.csv: Model version=claude-sonnet-5-5_max, Best score (across scorers)=0.8048780487804879, stderr=0.06265967111543964, Started at=2026-09-29T15:15:14.000Z |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025Max | Max | 100.0% | — | Epoch AI | Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, otis_mock_aime_2024_2025.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max)". effort is indicated by the suffix _max in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12.transcribed from tableSource excerptotis_mock_aime_2024_2025.csv: Model version=claude-sonnet-5-5_max, Best score (across scorers)=1.0, stderr=0.0, Started at=2026-09-29T15:15:14.000Z |
| SimpleQA VerifiedMax | Max | 46.5% | — | Epoch AI | Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, simpleqa_verified.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max)". effort is indicated by the suffix _max in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12.transcribed from tableSource excerptsimpleqa_verified.csv: Model version=claude-sonnet-5-5_max, Best score (across scorers)=0.465, stderr=0.015780495050030086, Started at=2026-09-29T15:15:14.000Z |
| Chess Puzzles(Epoch AI)Max | Max | 59.0% | — | Epoch AI | Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, chess_puzzles.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max)". effort is indicated by the suffix _max in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12.transcribed from tableSource excerptchess_puzzles.csv: Model version=claude-sonnet-5-5_max, Best score (across scorers)=0.59, stderr=0.04943110704237103, Started at=2026-10-13T13:00:38.000Z |
| MirrorCodeMax | Max | 97.8% | — | Epoch AI | Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, mirrorcode.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Claude Sonnet 5.5 (max)". effort is indicated by the suffix _max in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12.transcribed from tableSource excerptmirrorcode.csv: Model version=claude-sonnet-5-5_max, Best score (across scorers)=0.9777777777777777, stderr=0.015141892085983264, Started at=2026-10-05T09:05:15.000Z |
| Epoch Capabilities Index(ECI)not stated | not stated | 166.56 | — | Epoch AI | Epoch AI, epoch_capabilities_index/eci_scores.csv (CC BY 4.0)third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | A per-model metric that combines results across multiple benchmarks and multiple efforts (not per effort). Calculated by Epoch AI.transcribed from tableSource excerpteci_scores.csv: Model=Claude Sonnet 5.5, eci=166.56, eci_ci_low=163.76, eci_ci_high=169.58 |
| LMArena Text (style control, overall)Xhigh | Xhigh | 1,473 | — | LMArena | lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset text_style_control/latest-00000-of-00001.parquet (CC BY 4.0)third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Human head-to-head votes (Bradley-Terry). Source label "Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xHigh)" (effort is in parentheses in the label). Release date 2026-11-09.transcribed from tableSource excerptmodel_name=Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xHigh), rating=1472.49, rating_lower=1466.3, rating_upper=1478.6, vote_count=13821, rank=46, category=overall, leaderboard_publish_date=2026-11-09 |
| LMArena Text Coding (without style control)Xhigh | Xhigh | 1,500 | — | LMArena | lmarena-ai/leaderboard-dataset text/latest-00000-of-00001.parquet (CC BY 4.0)third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Human head-to-head votes (Bradley-Terry). Source label "Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xHigh)" (effort is in parentheses in the label). Release date 2026-11-09.transcribed from tableSource excerptmodel_name=Claude Sonnet 5.5 (xHigh), rating=1500.17, rating_lower=1488.9, rating_upper=1511.4, vote_count=3207, rank=25, category=coding, leaderboard_publish_date=2026-11-09 |
Related rankings
- Overall ranking (performance first)
- Terminal-Bench 4.0 ranking by metric
- Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 ranking by metric
- FrontierCode v1.1(main set) ranking by metric
- FrontierSWE 2 ranking by metric
- CursorBench 4.0 ranking by metric
- GDPval-AA v2.1 ranking by metric
- AA-Briefcase v1.1(Elo) ranking by metric
- Humanity's Last Exam (with tools) ranking by metric
- Humanity's Last Exam (without tools) ranking by metric
- OSWorld 2.1(partial) ranking by metric
- OSWorld 2.1(offline subset) ranking by metric
- Chartography (with tools) ranking by metric
- Chartography (without tools) ranking by metric
- HealthBench Professional (length-adjusted score) ranking by metric
- GPQA Diamond ranking by metric
- FrontierMath Tiers 1-3(v2) ranking by metric
- FrontierMath Tier 4(v2) ranking by metric
- OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 ranking by metric
- SimpleQA Verified ranking by metric
- Chess Puzzles(Epoch AI) ranking by metric
- MirrorCode ranking by metric
- Epoch Capabilities Index(ECI) ranking by metric
- LMArena Text (style control, overall) ranking by metric
- LMArena Text Coding (without style control) ranking by metric
- Recommendations by role