Chartography (without tools)
Accuracy in reading charts and figures (without tools). Provided by Surge AI.
- Category
- Multimodal
- Unit
- Percent (%)
- Higher is better
- Comparison groups
- 3total
- Currently available model rankings · Ranked results: 16
- All models (records): Groups: 4 · Entries: 27
Rankings
Values with different source types (official, third-party, paper) or measurement conditions cannot be compared, so rankings are separated by comparison group (the same source, or sources verified to use the same conditions).
Rankings include only models currently available in Claude Code / Codex, excluding legacy models.
- View on rankings page (by metric)
- Cost balance (frontier and effort changes)
- Overall ranking (performance first)
official results (Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2)
| Rank | Model | effort | Score | Source cost (metric) | measured/reported by | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Fable 5.2 | Max | 73.4% | $0.75Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Chartography (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)Source excerptChartography (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Fable 5.2 · Max: 73.4% $0.75" |
| 2 | Claude Fable 5.2 | Xhigh | 71.4% | $0.15Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Chartography (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)Source excerptChartography (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Fable 5.2 · Xhigh: 71.4% $0.15" |
| 3 | GPT-6 Astra | not stated | 71.0% | — | not stated | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. table note: Scores for Fable 5.2, Fable 5.1, and Opus 5.5 show results with safeguards on unless otherwise noted. All scores show each model’s highest-available effort unless otherwise noted. Values for other vendor models (as listed by Anthropic).Source excerpt71.0%Location Table, Chartography (no tools) row: 71.0 |
| 4 | Claude Fable 5.2 | High | 69.8% | $0.07Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Chartography (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)Source excerptChartography (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Fable 5.2 · High: 69.8% $0.07" |
| 5 | Claude Fable 5.2 | Med | 66.4% | $0.03Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Chartography (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)Source excerptChartography (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Fable 5.2 · Med: 66.4% $0.03" |
| 6 | Claude Opus 5.5 | Max | 64.4% | $0.49Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Chartography (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)Source excerptChartography (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Opus 5.5 · Max: 64.4% $0.49" |
| 7 | Claude Fable 5.2 | Low | 64.2% | $0.03Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Chartography (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)Source excerptChartography (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Fable 5.2 · Low: 64.2% $0.03" |
| 8 | Claude Opus 5.5 | Xhigh | 62.4% | $0.08Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Chartography (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)Source excerptChartography (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Opus 5.5 · Xhigh: 62.4% $0.08" |
| 9 | Claude Opus 5.5 | High | 59.2% | $0.03Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Chartography (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)Source excerptChartography (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Opus 5.5 · High: 59.2% $0.03" |
| 10 | Claude Opus 5.5 | Med | 59.0% | $0.03Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Chartography (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)Source excerptChartography (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Opus 5.5 · Med: 59.0% $0.03" |
| 11 | Claude Opus 5.5 | Low | 57.0% | $0.02Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Chartography (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)Source excerptChartography (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Opus 5.5 · Low: 57.0% $0.02" |
official results (Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5)
| Rank | Model | effort | Score | Source cost (metric) | measured/reported by | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 5.5 | not stated | 64.4% | — | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. table note: For details on how we run our evaluations, see the Sonnet 5.5 System Card (only efforts explicitly stated in the table)Source excerpt64.4%Location Table, Chartography (no tools) row: 64.4 |
| 2 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | not stated | 61.6% | — | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. table note: For details on how we run our evaluations, see the Sonnet 5.5 System Card (only efforts explicitly stated in the table)Source excerpt61.6%Location Table, Chartography (no tools) row: 61.6 |
official results (Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5)
| Rank | Model | effort | Score | Source cost (metric) | measured/reported by | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | not stated | 61.6% | — | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. table note: see the Haiku 5.5 System Card (effort not stated); Sonnet 5.5 is in the "For reference" columnSource excerpt61.6%Location Table, Chartography (no tools) row: 61.6 |
| 2 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | not stated | 46.4% | — | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. table note: see the Haiku 5.5 System Card (effort not stated)Source excerpt46.4%Location Table, Chartography (no tools) row: 46.4 |
| 3 | GPT-6 Luna | not stated | 29.1% | — | not stated | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. table note: see the Haiku 5.5 System Card (effort not stated); values for other vendor models (as listed by Anthropic)Source excerpt29.1%Location Table, Chartography (no tools) row: 29.1 |
All model rankings (records)
These rankings are recalculated by comparison group including legacy models and models unavailable in Claude Code / Codex. They differ from the rankings above because the set of models differs.
- View all model rankings (by metric)
- Cost balance (all models, records)
- Overall ranking (all models, records)
Show rankings including legacy and unavailable models (entries: 27)
official results (Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2)
| Rank | Model | effort | Score | Source cost (metric) | measured/reported by | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Fable 5.2 | Max | 73.4% | $0.75Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Chartography (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)Source excerptChartography (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Fable 5.2 · Max: 73.4% $0.75" |
| 2 | Gemini 4 Carbon | not stated | 72.5% | — | not stated | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. table note: Scores for Fable 5.2, Fable 5.1, and Opus 5.5 show results with safeguards on unless otherwise noted. All scores show each model’s highest-available effort unless otherwise noted. Values for other vendor models (as listed by Anthropic).Source excerpt72.5%Location Table, Chartography (no tools) row: 72.5 |
| 3 | Claude Fable 5.2 | Xhigh | 71.4% | $0.15Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Chartography (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)Source excerptChartography (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Fable 5.2 · Xhigh: 71.4% $0.15" |
| 4 | GPT-6 Astra | not stated | 71.0% | — | not stated | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. table note: Scores for Fable 5.2, Fable 5.1, and Opus 5.5 show results with safeguards on unless otherwise noted. All scores show each model’s highest-available effort unless otherwise noted. Values for other vendor models (as listed by Anthropic).Source excerpt71.0%Location Table, Chartography (no tools) row: 71.0 |
| 5 | Claude Fable 5.2 | High | 69.8% | $0.07Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Chartography (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)Source excerptChartography (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Fable 5.2 · High: 69.8% $0.07" |
| 6 | Claude Fable 5.2 | Med | 66.4% | $0.03Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Chartography (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)Source excerptChartography (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Fable 5.2 · Med: 66.4% $0.03" |
| 7 | Claude Opus 5.5 | Max | 64.4% | $0.49Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Chartography (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)Source excerptChartography (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Opus 5.5 · Max: 64.4% $0.49" |
| 8 | Claude Fable 5.2 | Low | 64.2% | $0.03Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Chartography (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)Source excerptChartography (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Fable 5.2 · Low: 64.2% $0.03" |
| 9 | Claude Opus 5.5 | Xhigh | 62.4% | $0.08Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Chartography (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)Source excerptChartography (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Opus 5.5 · Xhigh: 62.4% $0.08" |
| 10 | Claude Opus 5.5 | High | 59.2% | $0.03Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Chartography (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)Source excerptChartography (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Opus 5.5 · High: 59.2% $0.03" |
| 11 | Claude Opus 5.5 | Med | 59.0% | $0.03Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Chartography (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)Source excerptChartography (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Opus 5.5 · Med: 59.0% $0.03" |
| 12 | Claude Opus 5.5 | Low | 57.0% | $0.02Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Chartography (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)Source excerptChartography (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Opus 5.5 · Low: 57.0% $0.02" |
| 13 | Claude Fable 5.1 | Xhigh | 47.0% | $0.38Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Chartography (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)Source excerptChartography (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Fable 5.1 · Xhigh: 47.0% $0.38" |
| 14 | Claude Fable 5.1 | High | 46.0% | $0.08Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Chartography (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)Source excerptChartography (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Fable 5.1 · High: 46.0% $0.08" |
| 15 | Claude Fable 5.1 | Max | 44.8% | $0.87Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Chartography (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)Source excerptChartography (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Fable 5.1 · Max: 44.8% $0.87" |
| 16 | Claude Fable 5.1 | Med | 42.2% | $0.05Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Chartography (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)Source excerptChartography (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Fable 5.1 · Med: 42.2% $0.05" |
| 17 | Claude Fable 5.1 | Low | 36.6% | $0.03Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "Chartography (no tools) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic)Source excerptChartography (no tools) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Fable 5.1 · Low: 36.6% $0.03" |
official results (Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5)
| Rank | Model | effort | Score | Source cost (metric) | measured/reported by | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Opus 5.5 | not stated | 64.4% | — | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. table note: For details on how we run our evaluations, see the Sonnet 5.5 System Card (only efforts explicitly stated in the table)Source excerpt64.4%Location Table, Chartography (no tools) row: 64.4 |
| 2 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | not stated | 61.6% | — | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. table note: For details on how we run our evaluations, see the Sonnet 5.5 System Card (only efforts explicitly stated in the table)Source excerpt61.6%Location Table, Chartography (no tools) row: 61.6 |
| 3 | GPT-6 Sol | not stated | 53.6% | — | not stated | Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. table note: For details on how we run our evaluations, see the Sonnet 5.5 System Card (only efforts explicitly stated in the table); footnote 4: the GPT-6 Sol image understanding bug fix may not be reflected in the official score; values for other vendor models (as listed by Anthropic)Source excerpt53.6%Location Table, Chartography (no tools) row: 53.6 |
| 4 | Claude Sonnet 5 | not stated | 15.6% | — | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Sonnet 5.5Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. table note: For details on how we run our evaluations, see the Sonnet 5.5 System Card (only efforts explicitly stated in the table)Source excerpt15.6%Location Table, Chartography (no tools) row: 15.6 |
official results (Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5)
| Rank | Model | effort | Score | Source cost (metric) | measured/reported by | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Sonnet 5.5 | not stated | 61.6% | — | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. table note: see the Haiku 5.5 System Card (effort not stated); Sonnet 5.5 is in the "For reference" columnSource excerpt61.6%Location Table, Chartography (no tools) row: 61.6 |
| 2 | Claude Haiku 5.5 | not stated | 46.4% | — | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. table note: see the Haiku 5.5 System Card (effort not stated)Source excerpt46.4%Location Table, Chartography (no tools) row: 46.4 |
| 3 | GPT-6 Luna | not stated | 29.1% | — | not stated | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. table note: see the Haiku 5.5 System Card (effort not stated); values for other vendor models (as listed by Anthropic)Source excerpt29.1%Location Table, Chartography (no tools) row: 29.1 |
| 4 | Claude Haiku 4.5 | not stated | 6.4% | — | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Haiku 5.5Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. table note: see the Haiku 5.5 System Card (effort not stated)Source excerpt6.4%Location Table, Chartography (no tools) row: 6.4 |
official results (Gemini 4 Carbon (Google DeepMind models page, benchmark table))
| Rank | Model | effort | Score | Source cost (metric) | measured/reported by | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gemini 4 Carbon | High | 72.5% | — | not stated | Gemini 4 Carbon (Google DeepMind models page, benchmark table)Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. Google published table. methodology PDF: Gemini 4 Carbon/Argon used the highest Gemini API thinking setting, pass@1, and a single trial. Row-specific source: without tools, following the Surge official leaderboardSource excerptChartography: Gemini 4 Carbon 72.5 |
| 2 | Gemini 4 Argon | High | 71.6% | — | not stated | Gemini 4 Carbon (Google DeepMind models page, benchmark table)Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. Google published table. methodology PDF: Gemini 4 Carbon/Argon used the highest Gemini API thinking setting, pass@1, and a single trial. Row-specific source: without tools, following the Surge official leaderboardSource excerptChartography: Gemini 4 Argon 71.6 |