Kimi K3.1 Pro
- Input price
- —
- Per 1 million tokens (USD)
- Output price
- —
- Per 1 million tokens (USD)
- Effort levels
- 3total
- Default: Max
- Benchmark results
- 28total
- Benchmark types: 28
Model information
- API model ID
- kimi-k3.1-pro
- release date
- Unknown
- effort
- Low / High / Max (default)
- Effort source
- Based on Kimi API Reasoning Effort documentation (platform.kimi.ai/docs/guide/use-thinking-effort) and 5. Model Usage in the HF model card (moonshotai/Kimi-K3.1-Pro): low, high, max, default is max.
- Claude Code
- unavailable
- Codex
- unavailable
- Availability notes
- Kimi Code is the official route for use. Claude Code is mentioned only as a benchmark harness. The official model list for Claude Code / Codex (checked 2026-11-12) contains only Anthropic / OpenAI models, respectively, so both are false.
- Availability source
- https://kimi.com/en/blog/kimi-k3-1-pro
Price (USD per 1 million tokens)
Prices do not vary by effort; token consumption does.
| input | — |
|---|---|
| output | — |
| cache read | — |
| cache write | — |
The figures in the official pricing table could not be read when the page was fetched, so they could not be collected. batch is 60% of standard pricing; K3 series cache write is charged separately by TTL (5min/1h). context 1,048,576
Benchmark results
| Benchmark | effort | Score | Source cost (metric) | measured/reported by | source | Conditions and extraction method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 4.0Max (default) | Max | 65.7% | — | Moonshot AI | Introducing Kimi K3.1 Proofficial · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. Self-reported by Moonshot. footnote: reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0, top-p 0.95. Evaluated with the Claude-Code harnesstranscribed from textSource excerptTerminal-Bench 4.0 65.7% |
| Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1Max (default) | Max | 38.1% | — | Moonshot AI | Kimi K3.1 Pro (Hugging Face model card, moonshotai)official · Retrieved 2026-11-13 | Vendor-reported value (self-reported by Moonshot AI). Table column heading Kimi K3.1 Pro (max), table note: all Kimi K3.1 Pro results use reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0, top-p 0.95. Evaluated with Claude Code.transcribed from tableSource excerptTerminal-Bench-Science 0.1 | 38.1Location HF model card "3. Evaluation Results" table, Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 row, Kimi K3.1 Pro (max) column (leftmost numeric column). Supporting footnote: Coding 2 |
| DeepSWE v1.1Max (default) | Max | 75.5% | — | Moonshot AI | Kimi K3.1 Pro (Hugging Face model card, moonshotai)official · Retrieved 2026-11-13 | Vendor-reported value (self-reported by Moonshot AI). Table column heading Kimi K3.1 Pro (max), table note: all Kimi K3.1 Pro results use reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0, top-p 0.95. Evaluated with Claude Code.transcribed from tableSource excerptDeepSWE v1.1 | 75.5Location HF model card "3. Evaluation Results" table, DeepSWE v1.1 row, Kimi K3.1 Pro (max) column (leftmost numeric column). Supporting footnote: Coding 5 |
| Chartography (with tools)Max (default) | Max | 90.2% | — | Moonshot AI | Kimi K3.1 Pro (Hugging Face model card, moonshotai)official · Retrieved 2026-11-13 | Vendor-reported value (self-reported by Moonshot AI). Table column heading Kimi K3.1 Pro (max), table note: all Kimi K3.1 Pro results use reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0, top-p 0.95. With tools (Python); average of 5 runs.transcribed from tableSource excerptChartoGraphy w/ python | 90.2Location HF model card "3. Evaluation Results" table, ChartoGraphy w/ python row, Kimi K3.1 Pro (max) column (leftmost numeric column). Supporting footnote: Agentic 11 |
| BenchCAD (with tools, version not stated)Max (default) | Max | 92.7 | — | Moonshot AI | Introducing Kimi K3.1 Proofficial · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. Self-reported by Moonshot. footnote: reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0, top-p 0.95. with toolstranscribed from textSource excerptBenchCAD, with tools 92.7 |
| BenchCAD (without tools, version not stated)Max (default) | Max | 72.8 | — | Moonshot AI | Introducing Kimi K3.1 Proofficial · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. Self-reported by Moonshot. footnote: reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0, top-p 0.95. without toolstranscribed from textSource excerptBenchCAD, without tools 72.8 |
| ExploitGymMax (default) | Max | 20.7% | — | Moonshot AI | Kimi K3.1 Pro (Hugging Face model card, moonshotai)official · Retrieved 2026-11-13 | Vendor-reported value (self-reported by Moonshot AI). Table column heading Kimi K3.1 Pro (max), table note: all Kimi K3.1 Pro results use reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0, top-p 0.95. Kimi Code; 6 hours per 1 task.transcribed from tableSource excerptExploitGym | 20.7Location HF model card "3. Evaluation Results" table, ExploitGym row, Kimi K3.1 Pro (max) column (leftmost numeric column). Supporting footnote: Cyber 2 |
| GDP.PDFMax (default) | Max | 34.6% | — | Moonshot AI | Kimi K3.1 Pro (Hugging Face model card, moonshotai)official · Retrieved 2026-11-13 | Vendor-reported value (self-reported by Moonshot AI). Table column heading Kimi K3.1 Pro (max), table note: all Kimi K3.1 Pro results use reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0, top-p 0.95. Strict pass rate for answers with all items graded; grading by Gemini-3.5-Flash Medium.transcribed from tableSource excerptGDP.pdf | 34.6Location HF model card "3. Evaluation Results" table, GDP.pdf row, Kimi K3.1 Pro (max) column (leftmost numeric column). Supporting footnote: Reasoning 1 |
| CharXiv ReasoningMax (default) | Max | 89.0% | — | Moonshot AI | Kimi K3.1 Pro (Hugging Face model card, moonshotai)official · Retrieved 2026-11-13 | Vendor-reported value (self-reported by Moonshot AI). Table column heading Kimi K3.1 Pro (max), table note: all Kimi K3.1 Pro results use reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0, top-p 0.95transcribed from tableSource excerptCharXiv (RQ) | 89.0Location HF model card "3. Evaluation Results" table, CharXiv (RQ) row, Kimi K3.1 Pro (max) column (leftmost numeric column). Supporting footnote: Reasoning 3 (average of 4 runs) |
| OfficeQA Pro v2Max (default) | Max | 64.4 | — | Moonshot AI | Introducing Kimi K3.1 Proofficial · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. Self-reported by Moonshot. footnote: reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0, top-p 0.95.transcribed from textSource excerptOfficeQA Pro v2 64.4 |
| Frontier FinanceMax (default) | Max | 58.6 | — | Moonshot AI | Introducing Kimi K3.1 Proofficial · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Vendor-reported value. Self-reported by Moonshot. footnote: reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0, top-p 0.95.transcribed from textSource excerptFrontier Finance 58.6 |
| GPQA DiamondMax (default) | Max | 94.2% | — | Epoch AI | Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, gpqa_diamond.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Kimi K3.1 Pro (Together, max)". effort is indicated by the suffix _max in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12. Epoch ran it via Together's inference API (Model version kimi-k3.1-pro-together).transcribed from tableSource excerptgpqa_diamond.csv: Model version=kimi-k3.1-pro-together_max, Best score (across scorers)=0.9419191919191919, stderr=0.01439446786793499, Started at=2026-11-06T00:59:23.000ZLocation gpqa_diamond.csv, data row 2 (file line 3), id=2bhYPjF6VRWc5CeERGq8g5, Model version=kimi-k3.1-pro-together_max |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3(v2)Max (default) | Max | 78.3% | — | Epoch AI | Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, frontiermath_tiers_1_3_v2.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Kimi K3.1 Pro (Together, max)". effort is indicated by the suffix _max in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12. Epoch ran it via Together's inference API (Model version kimi-k3.1-pro-together).transcribed from tableSource excerptfrontiermath_tiers_1_3_v2.csv: Model version=kimi-k3.1-pro-together_max, Best score (across scorers)=0.7824561403508772, stderr=0.024481850763866792, Started at=2026-11-06T00:59:23.000ZLocation frontiermath_tiers_1_3_v2.csv, data row 2 (file line 3), id=9iqojBnRuywLNkMDSVdwpJ, Model version=kimi-k3.1-pro-together_max |
| FrontierMath Tier 4(v2)Max (default) | Max | 65.9% | — | Epoch AI | Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, frontiermath_tier_4_v2.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Kimi K3.1 Pro (Together, max)". effort is indicated by the suffix _max in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12. Epoch ran it via Together's inference API (Model version kimi-k3.1-pro-together).transcribed from tableSource excerptfrontiermath_tier_4_v2.csv: Model version=kimi-k3.1-pro-together_max, Best score (across scorers)=0.6585365853658537, stderr=0.07497768853141171, Started at=2026-11-06T00:59:23.000ZLocation frontiermath_tier_4_v2.csv, data row 2 (file line 3), id=o7TxEhAxnN2qKUqqhFgp5H, Model version=kimi-k3.1-pro-together_max |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025Max (default) | Max | 100.0% | — | Epoch AI | Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, otis_mock_aime_2024_2025.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Kimi K3.1 Pro (Together, max)". effort is indicated by the suffix _max in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12. Epoch ran it via Together's inference API (Model version kimi-k3.1-pro-together).transcribed from tableSource excerptotis_mock_aime_2024_2025.csv: Model version=kimi-k3.1-pro-together_max, Best score (across scorers)=1.0, stderr=0.0, Started at=2026-11-06T00:59:23.000ZLocation otis_mock_aime_2024_2025.csv, data row 2 (file line 3), id=8Qe2qf4Eg77PMfp2Eh7V6K, Model version=kimi-k3.1-pro-together_max |
| SimpleQA VerifiedMax (default) | Max | 62.2% | — | Epoch AI | Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, simpleqa_verified.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Kimi K3.1 Pro (Together, max)". effort is indicated by the suffix _max in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12. Epoch ran it via Together's inference API (Model version kimi-k3.1-pro-together).transcribed from tableSource excerptsimpleqa_verified.csv: Model version=kimi-k3.1-pro-together_max, Best score (across scorers)=0.622, stderr=0.015341165254026547, Started at=2026-11-06T00:59:23.000ZLocation simpleqa_verified.csv, data row 2 (file line 3), id=HumfsXVh5BZWuTo6Z8Gqnf, Model version=kimi-k3.1-pro-together_max |
| Chess Puzzles(Epoch AI)Max (default) | Max | 45.0% | — | Epoch AI | Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, chess_puzzles.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Kimi K3.1 Pro (Together, max)". effort is indicated by the suffix _max in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12. Epoch ran it via Together's inference API (Model version kimi-k3.1-pro-together).transcribed from tableSource excerptchess_puzzles.csv: Model version=kimi-k3.1-pro-together_max, Best score (across scorers)=0.45, stderr=0.05, Started at=2026-11-06T00:59:23.000ZLocation chess_puzzles.csv, data row 2 (file line 3), id=8eSYUWwajdBjKiiM9CwnKu, Model version=kimi-k3.1-pro-together_max |
| Epoch Capabilities Index(ECI)not stated | not stated | 161.37 | — | Epoch AI | Epoch AI, epoch_capabilities_index/eci_scores.csv (CC BY 4.0)third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | A per-model metric that combines results across multiple benchmarks and multiple efforts (not per effort). Calculated by Epoch AI.transcribed from tableSource excerpteci_scores.csv: Model=Kimi K3.1 Pro, eci=161.37, eci_ci_low=158.99, eci_ci_high=164.0Location epoch_capabilities_index/eci_scores.csv, data row 16 (file line 17), Model=Kimi K3.1 Pro |
| SWE-Marathon v1.1Max (default) | Max | 51.7% | — | Moonshot AI | Kimi K3.1 Pro (Hugging Face model card, moonshotai)official · Retrieved 2026-11-13 | Vendor-reported value (self-reported by Moonshot AI). Table column heading Kimi K3.1 Pro (max), table note: all Kimi K3.1 Pro results use reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0, top-p 0.95. Evaluated with Claude Code.transcribed from tableSource excerptSWE Marathon v1.1 | 51.7Location HF model card "3. Evaluation Results" table, SWE Marathon v1.1 row, Kimi K3.1 Pro (max) column (leftmost numeric column). Supporting footnote: Coding 3 |
| ProgramBench(Almost Solved)Max (default) | Max | 31.5% | — | Moonshot AI | Kimi K3.1 Pro (Hugging Face model card, moonshotai)official · Retrieved 2026-11-13 | Vendor-reported value (self-reported by Moonshot AI). Table column heading Kimi K3.1 Pro (max), table note: all Kimi K3.1 Pro results use reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0, top-p 0.95. Binary aggregation assigning 1 when a task's ProgramBench score is at least 95%; evaluated with Claude Code.transcribed from tableSource excerptProgram Bench | 31.5Location HF model card "3. Evaluation Results" table, Program Bench row, Kimi K3.1 Pro (max) column (leftmost numeric column). Supporting footnote: Coding 4 |
| BrowseCompMax (default) | Max | 92.1% | — | Moonshot AI | Kimi K3.1 Pro (Hugging Face model card, moonshotai)official · Retrieved 2026-11-13 | Vendor-reported value (self-reported by Moonshot AI). Table column heading Kimi K3.1 Pro (max), table note: all Kimi K3.1 Pro results use reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0, top-p 0.95. Context compression at 200K tokens; maximum 500 steps; top-p 1.0.transcribed from tableSource excerptBrowseComp | 92.1Location HF model card "3. Evaluation Results" table, BrowseComp row, Kimi K3.1 Pro (max) column (leftmost numeric column). Supporting footnote: Agentic 9 |
| CharXiv Reasoning (with tools)Max (default) | Max | 93.4% | — | Moonshot AI | Kimi K3.1 Pro (Hugging Face model card, moonshotai)official · Retrieved 2026-11-13 | Vendor-reported value (self-reported by Moonshot AI). Table column heading Kimi K3.1 Pro (max), table note: all Kimi K3.1 Pro results use reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0, top-p 0.95. With tools (Python); average of 4 runs.transcribed from tableSource excerptCharXiv (RQ) w/ python | 93.4Location HF model card "3. Evaluation Results" table, CharXiv (RQ) w/ python row, Kimi K3.1 Pro (max) column (leftmost numeric column). Supporting footnote: Agentic 11 |
| MMMU-ProMax (default) | Max | 84.1% | — | Moonshot AI | Kimi K3.1 Pro (Hugging Face model card, moonshotai)official · Retrieved 2026-11-13 | Vendor-reported value (self-reported by Moonshot AI). Table column heading Kimi K3.1 Pro (max), table note: all Kimi K3.1 Pro results use reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0, top-p 0.95. Official protocol (preserving input order and placing images first).transcribed from tableSource excerptMMMU-Pro | 84.1Location HF model card "3. Evaluation Results" table, MMMU-Pro row, Kimi K3.1 Pro (max) column (leftmost numeric column). Supporting footnote: Reasoning 4 |
| MMMU-Pro (with tools)Max (default) | Max | 90.0% | — | Moonshot AI | Kimi K3.1 Pro (Hugging Face model card, moonshotai)official · Retrieved 2026-11-13 | Vendor-reported value (self-reported by Moonshot AI). Table column heading Kimi K3.1 Pro (max), table note: all Kimi K3.1 Pro results use reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0, top-p 0.95. With tools (Python); average of 4 runs.transcribed from tableSource excerptMMMU-Pro w/ python | 90.0Location HF model card "3. Evaluation Results" table, MMMU-Pro w/ python row, Kimi K3.1 Pro (max) column (leftmost numeric column). Supporting footnote: Agentic 11 |
| BabyVision (with tools)Max (default) | Max | 95.4% | — | Moonshot AI | Kimi K3.1 Pro (Hugging Face model card, moonshotai)official · Retrieved 2026-11-13 | Vendor-reported value (self-reported by Moonshot AI). Table column heading Kimi K3.1 Pro (max), table note: all Kimi K3.1 Pro results use reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0, top-p 0.95. With tools (Python); average of 4 runs.transcribed from tableSource excerptBabyVision w/ python | 95.4Location HF model card "3. Evaluation Results" table, BabyVision w/ python row, Kimi K3.1 Pro (max) column (leftmost numeric column). Supporting footnote: Agentic 11 |
| ZeroBench main (with tools, pass@5)Max (default) | Max | 63.0% | — | Moonshot AI | Kimi K3.1 Pro (Hugging Face model card, moonshotai)official · Retrieved 2026-11-13 | Vendor-reported value (self-reported by Moonshot AI). Table column heading Kimi K3.1 Pro (max), table note: all Kimi K3.1 Pro results use reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0, top-p 0.95. With tools (Python); 5 runs.transcribed from tableSource excerptZeroBench_main w/ python (pass@5) | 63.0Location HF model card "3. Evaluation Results" table, ZeroBench_main w/ python (pass@5) row, Kimi K3.1 Pro (max) column (leftmost numeric column). Supporting footnote: Agentic 11 |
| OfficeQA ProMax (default) | Max | 67.4 | — | Moonshot AI | Kimi K3.1 Pro (Hugging Face model card, moonshotai)official · Retrieved 2026-11-13 | Vendor-reported value (self-reported by Moonshot AI). Table column heading Kimi K3.1 Pro (max), table note: all Kimi K3.1 Pro results use reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0, top-p 0.95. Evaluated with Claude Code; PDF contains only page images.transcribed from tableSource excerptOfficeQA Pro | 67.4Location HF model card "3. Evaluation Results" table, OfficeQA Pro row, Kimi K3.1 Pro (max) column (leftmost numeric column). Supporting footnote: Agentic 3 |
| PostTrainBench v1.2Max (default) | Max | 36.5% | — | Moonshot AI | Kimi K3.1 Pro (Hugging Face model card, moonshotai)official · Retrieved 2026-11-13 | Vendor-reported value (self-reported by Moonshot AI). Table column heading Kimi K3.1 Pro (max), table note: all Kimi K3.1 Pro results use reasoning effort max, temperature 1.0, top-p 0.95. v1.2 evaluated in-house using H20 GPU instead of H100, with Claude Code.transcribed from tableSource excerptPostTrain Bench v1.2 | 36.5Location HF model card "3. Evaluation Results" table, PostTrain Bench v1.2 row, Kimi K3.1 Pro (max) column (leftmost numeric column). Supporting footnote: Coding 6 |
Related rankings
- Overall ranking (all models, records)
- Terminal-Bench 4.0 ranking by metric (all models, records)
- Terminal-Bench-Science 0.1 ranking by metric (all models, records)
- DeepSWE v1.1 ranking by metric (all models, records)
- Chartography (with tools) ranking by metric (all models, records)
- BenchCAD (with tools, version not stated) ranking by metric (all models, records)
- BenchCAD (without tools, version not stated) ranking by metric (all models, records)
- ExploitGym ranking by metric (all models, records)
- GDP.PDF ranking by metric (all models, records)
- CharXiv Reasoning ranking by metric (all models, records)
- OfficeQA Pro v2 ranking by metric (all models, records)
- Frontier Finance ranking by metric (all models, records)
- GPQA Diamond ranking by metric (all models, records)
- FrontierMath Tiers 1-3(v2) ranking by metric (all models, records)
- FrontierMath Tier 4(v2) ranking by metric (all models, records)
- OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 ranking by metric (all models, records)
- SimpleQA Verified ranking by metric (all models, records)
- Chess Puzzles(Epoch AI) ranking by metric (all models, records)
- Epoch Capabilities Index(ECI) ranking by metric (all models, records)
- SWE-Marathon v1.1 ranking by metric (all models, records)
- ProgramBench(Almost Solved) ranking by metric (all models, records)
- BrowseComp ranking by metric (all models, records)
- CharXiv Reasoning (with tools) ranking by metric (all models, records)
- MMMU-Pro ranking by metric (all models, records)
- MMMU-Pro (with tools) ranking by metric (all models, records)
- BabyVision (with tools) ranking by metric (all models, records)
- ZeroBench main (with tools, pass@5) ranking by metric (all models, records)
- OfficeQA Pro ranking by metric (all models, records)
- PostTrainBench v1.2 ranking by metric (all models, records)
- Recommendations by role