Gemini 3.6 Flash
- Input price
- $0.75
- Per 1 million tokens (USD)
- Output price
- $3.75
- Per 1 million tokens (USD)
- Effort levels
- 4total
- Default: Med
- Benchmark results
- 27total
- Benchmark types: 21
Model information
- API model ID
- gemini-3.6-flash
- release date
- Unknown
- effort
- Minimal / Low / Med (default) / High
- Effort source
- Based on thinking level in Gemini API thinking documentation (aistudio.google.com/docs/thinking).
- Claude Code
- unavailable
- Codex
- unavailable
- Availability notes
- Support in Claude Code / Codex is not explicitly stated officially (Gemini API, AI Studio, Antigravity, etc. are official routes). The official model list for Claude Code / Codex (checked 2026-11-12) contains only Anthropic / OpenAI models, respectively, so both are false.
- Availability source
- https://aistudio.google.com/docs/models
Price (USD per 1 million tokens)
Prices do not vary by effort; token consumption does.
| input | $0.75 |
|---|---|
| output | $3.75 |
| cache read | $0.075 |
| cache write | — |
After revision: input $1.50 / output $7.50 / cache $0.15 (the revision date is shown with the same arrow notation as 3.8 Flash on the page)
Gemini 3.6 Flash gemini-3.6-flash $0.75 → $1.50 / $3.75 → $7.50 / $0.075 → $0.15Benchmark results
| Benchmark | effort | Score | Source cost (metric) | measured/reported by | source | Conditions and extraction method |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Terminal-Bench 3.0not stated | not stated | 5.4% | — | Gemini 3.7 Flash model cardofficial · Retrieved 2026-11-13 | Vendor-reported value. Table in the Google model card. methodology PDF (deepmind.com/models/evals-methodology/gemini-3-7-flash): All of the results are run with the Gemini API ... with default sampling settings unless indicated otherwise. Gemini computed in-house; mini swe agent harness (LiteLLM 1.96). Minor changes to 2 tasks for compatibility. thinking level not statedtranscribed from tableSource excerptTerminal-bench 3.0 General agent capabilities | 5.4%Location Gemini 3.7 Flash model card Evaluation table, Terminal-bench 3.0 row, Gemini 3.6 Flash column. In-house computation basis: methodology PDF, Coding / Terminal-Bench 3 | |
| Terminal-Bench 2.1not stated | not stated | 78.0% | — | Gemini 3.7 Flash model cardofficial · Retrieved 2026-11-13 | Vendor-reported value. Table in the Google model card. methodology PDF (deepmind.com/models/evals-methodology/gemini-3-7-flash): All of the results are run with the Gemini API ... with default sampling settings unless indicated otherwise. Gemini computed in-house; default harness Terminus 2. thinking level not statedtranscribed from tableSource excerptTerminal-bench 2.1 Agentic terminal coding | 78.0%Location Gemini 3.7 Flash model card Evaluation table, Terminal-bench 2.1 row, Gemini 3.6 Flash column. In-house computation basis: methodology PDF, Coding / Terminal-Bench 2.1 | |
| HLE-Verifiednot stated | not stated | 51.2% | — | Gemini 3.7 Flash model cardofficial · Retrieved 2026-11-13 | Vendor-reported value. Table in the Google model card. methodology PDF (deepmind.com/models/evals-methodology/gemini-3-7-flash): All of the results are run with the Gemini API ... with default sampling settings unless indicated otherwise. All models computed in-house; 1,811 verified questionstranscribed from tableSource excerptHLE-Verified Multidisciplinary expert reasoning | 51.2%Location Gemini 3.7 Flash model card Evaluation table, HLE-Verified row, Gemini 3.6 Flash column. In-house computation basis: methodology PDF, Scientific Reasoning / HLE-Verified | |
| OSWorld 2.0not stated | not stated | 33.8% | — | Gemini 3.7 Flash model cardofficial · Retrieved 2026-11-13 | Vendor-reported value. Table in the Google model card. methodology PDF (deepmind.com/models/evals-methodology/gemini-3-7-flash): All of the results are run with the Gemini API ... with default sampling settings unless indicated otherwise. Computed in-house; partial score; maximum of 3 runs (1 trial each); up to 500 steps; run before the official 08.08 patchtranscribed from tableSource excerptOSWorld-2.0 Agentic computer use | 33.8%Location Gemini 3.7 Flash model card Evaluation table, OSWorld-2.0 row, Gemini 3.6 Flash column. In-house computation basis: methodology PDF, Computer use / OSWorld 2.0 | |
| Agents' Last Exam (pass rate, version not stated)not stated | not stated | 24.2% | — | Gemini 3.7 Flash model cardofficial · Retrieved 2026-11-13 | Vendor-reported value. Table in the Google model card. methodology PDF (deepmind.com/models/evals-methodology/gemini-3-7-flash): All of the results are run with the Gemini API ... with default sampling settings unless indicated otherwise. Computed in-house; default ALE-Claw harness. version not statedtranscribed from tableSource excerptAgent's Last Exam Multimodal desktop and OS agent tasks | Pass rate | 24.2%Location Gemini 3.7 Flash model card Evaluation table, Agent's Last Exam(Pass rate) row, Gemini 3.6 Flash column. In-house computation basis: methodology PDF, Computer use / Agent's Last Exam | |
| LABBench 2not stated | not stated | 76.1% | — | Gemini 3.7 Flash model cardofficial · Retrieved 2026-11-13 | Vendor-reported value. Table in the Google model card. methodology PDF (deepmind.com/models/evals-methodology/gemini-3-7-flash): All of the results are run with the Gemini API ... with default sampling settings unless indicated otherwise. Gemini computed in-housetranscribed from tableSource excerptLABBench2 Biology real-world research tasks | 76.1%Location Gemini 3.7 Flash model card Evaluation table, LABBench2 row, Gemini 3.6 Flash column. In-house computation basis: methodology PDF, Scientific Reasoning / LABBench2 | |
| LVBenchnot stated | not stated | 84.2% | — | Gemini 3.7 Flash model cardofficial · Retrieved 2026-11-13 | Vendor-reported value. Table in the Google model card. methodology PDF (deepmind.com/models/evals-methodology/gemini-3-7-flash): All of the results are run with the Gemini API ... with default sampling settings unless indicated otherwise. Computed in-house; 1024 frames; without toolstranscribed from tableSource excerptLVBench Long video understanding | 84.2%Location Gemini 3.7 Flash model card Evaluation table, LVBench row, Gemini 3.6 Flash column. In-house computation basis: methodology PDF, Multimodal / LVBench | |
| GDP.PDFnot stated | not stated | 22.0% | — | Gemini 3.7 Flash model cardofficial · Retrieved 2026-11-13 | Vendor-reported value. Table in the Google model card. methodology PDF (deepmind.com/models/evals-methodology/gemini-3-7-flash): All of the results are run with the Gemini API ... with default sampling settings unless indicated otherwise. Gemini computed in-house. Metric name not statedtranscribed from tableSource excerptGDP.pdf Expert PDF document comprehension | 22.0%Location Gemini 3.7 Flash model card Evaluation table, GDP.pdf row, Gemini 3.6 Flash column. In-house computation basis: methodology PDF, Multimodal / GDP.PDF | |
| CharXiv Reasoningnot stated | not stated | 85.2% | — | Gemini 3.7 Flash model cardofficial · Retrieved 2026-11-13 | Vendor-reported value. Table in the Google model card. methodology PDF (deepmind.com/models/evals-methodology/gemini-3-7-flash): All of the results are run with the Gemini API ... with default sampling settings unless indicated otherwise. Gemini computed in-house; without toolstranscribed from tableSource excerptCharXiv Reasoning Information synthesis from complex charts | No tools | 85.2%Location Gemini 3.7 Flash model card Evaluation table, CharXiv Reasoning(No tools) row, Gemini 3.6 Flash column. In-house computation basis: methodology PDF, Multimodal / CharXiv Reasoning | |
| BioMysteryBench(Human Solvable)not stated | not stated | 80.6% | — | Gemini 3.7 Flash model cardofficial · Retrieved 2026-11-13 | Vendor-reported value. Table in the Google model card. methodology PDF (deepmind.com/models/evals-methodology/gemini-3-7-flash): All of the results are run with the Gemini API ... with default sampling settings unless indicated otherwise. Gemini computed in-house; Linux terminal and internet restricted to allowed domainstranscribed from tableSource excerptBioMysteryBench Bioinformatics research reasoning | Human solvable | 80.6%Location Gemini 3.7 Flash model card Evaluation table, BioMysteryBench(Human solvable) row, Gemini 3.6 Flash column. In-house computation basis: methodology PDF, Scientific Reasoning / BioMysteryBench | |
| BioMysteryBench(Human Difficult)not stated | not stated | 41.2% | — | Gemini 3.7 Flash model cardofficial · Retrieved 2026-11-13 | Vendor-reported value. Table in the Google model card. methodology PDF (deepmind.com/models/evals-methodology/gemini-3-7-flash): All of the results are run with the Gemini API ... with default sampling settings unless indicated otherwise. Gemini computed in-housetranscribed from tableSource excerptHuman difficult | 41.2%Location Gemini 3.7 Flash model card Evaluation table, BioMysteryBench(Human difficult) row, Gemini 3.6 Flash column. In-house computation basis: methodology PDF, Scientific Reasoning / BioMysteryBench | |
| GPQA DiamondMinimal | Minimal | 85.9% | — | Epoch AI | Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, gpqa_diamond.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Gemini 3.6 Flash". effort is indicated by the suffix _minimal in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12.transcribed from tableSource excerptgpqa_diamond.csv: Model version=gemini-3.6-flash_minimal, Best score (across scorers)=0.8585858585858586, stderr=0.024825909793343353, Started at=2026-08-07T00:17:01.000ZLocation gpqa_diamond.csv, data row 104 (file line 162), id=aPmR8fV49N98a6NVKpASAf, Model version=gemini-3.6-flash_minimal |
| GPQA DiamondLow | Low | 86.4% | — | Epoch AI | Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, gpqa_diamond.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Gemini 3.6 Flash". effort is indicated by the suffix _low in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12.transcribed from tableSource excerptgpqa_diamond.csv: Model version=gemini-3.6-flash_low, Best score (across scorers)=0.8636363636363636, stderr=0.02445015597318985, Started at=2026-08-06T22:36:03.000ZLocation gpqa_diamond.csv, data row 123 (file line 183), id=JoraLb9y55QXpMg4Rrmr5x, Model version=gemini-3.6-flash_low |
| GPQA DiamondHigh | High | 94.1% | — | Epoch AI | Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, gpqa_diamond.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Gemini 3.6 Flash". effort is indicated by the suffix _high in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12.transcribed from tableSource excerptgpqa_diamond.csv: Model version=gemini-3.6-flash_high, Best score (across scorers)=0.9412878787878788, stderr=0.014028967942064968, Started at=2026-08-02T00:21:27.000ZLocation gpqa_diamond.csv, data row 148 (file line 210), id=86SY5JbPB49xXhHFQW6tHu, Model version=gemini-3.6-flash_high |
| FrontierMath Tiers 1-3(v2)High | High | 59.0% | — | Epoch AI | Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, frontiermath_tiers_1_3_v2.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Gemini 3.6 Flash". effort is indicated by the suffix _high in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12.transcribed from tableSource excerptfrontiermath_tiers_1_3_v2.csv: Model version=gemini-3.6-flash_high, Best score (across scorers)=0.5894736842105263, stderr=0.02919063494391404, Started at=2026-08-02T00:36:45.000ZLocation frontiermath_tiers_1_3_v2.csv, data row 86 (file line 114), id=nb9LnDeeQyvRCqsbsTANGD, Model version=gemini-3.6-flash_high |
| FrontierMath Tier 4(v2)High | High | 22.0% | — | Epoch AI | Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, frontiermath_tier_4_v2.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Gemini 3.6 Flash". effort is indicated by the suffix _high in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12.transcribed from tableSource excerptfrontiermath_tier_4_v2.csv: Model version=gemini-3.6-flash_high, Best score (across scorers)=0.21951219512195122, stderr=0.06544589202438408, Started at=2026-08-02T00:36:45.000ZLocation frontiermath_tier_4_v2.csv, data row 40 (file line 75), id=JCMjXU6FRiiLV3xvs9R2Xv, Model version=gemini-3.6-flash_high |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025Minimal | Minimal | 80.0% | — | Epoch AI | Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, otis_mock_aime_2024_2025.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Gemini 3.6 Flash". effort is indicated by the suffix _minimal in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12.transcribed from tableSource excerptotis_mock_aime_2024_2025.csv: Model version=gemini-3.6-flash_minimal, Best score (across scorers)=0.8, stderr=0.06030226891555273, Started at=2026-08-07T00:07:32.000ZLocation otis_mock_aime_2024_2025.csv, data row 113 (file line 178), id=cF97JqHbFxxp7ePjYVK9HV, Model version=gemini-3.6-flash_minimal |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025Low | Low | 82.2% | — | Epoch AI | Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, otis_mock_aime_2024_2025.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Gemini 3.6 Flash". effort is indicated by the suffix _low in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12.transcribed from tableSource excerptotis_mock_aime_2024_2025.csv: Model version=gemini-3.6-flash_low, Best score (across scorers)=0.8222222222222222, stderr=0.057637747950250916, Started at=2026-08-07T00:07:20.000ZLocation otis_mock_aime_2024_2025.csv, data row 114 (file line 179), id=6iEkMa88YjLDgcde4bLm8B, Model version=gemini-3.6-flash_low |
| OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025High | High | 94.2% | — | Epoch AI | Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, otis_mock_aime_2024_2025.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Gemini 3.6 Flash". effort is indicated by the suffix _high in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12.transcribed from tableSource excerptotis_mock_aime_2024_2025.csv: Model version=gemini-3.6-flash_high, Best score (across scorers)=0.9416666666666667, stderr=0.030926354359015452, Started at=2026-08-02T00:21:27.000ZLocation otis_mock_aime_2024_2025.csv, data row 155 (file line 222), id=ajQFZGMjvyMTH2ULDZhwtz, Model version=gemini-3.6-flash_high |
| SimpleQA VerifiedHigh | High | 66.2% | — | Epoch AI | Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, simpleqa_verified.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Gemini 3.6 Flash". effort is indicated by the suffix _high in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12.transcribed from tableSource excerptsimpleqa_verified.csv: Model version=gemini-3.6-flash_high, Best score (across scorers)=0.662, stderr=0.014965960710224383, Started at=2026-08-27T19:30:09.000ZLocation simpleqa_verified.csv, data row 61 (file line 108), id=F83pa7Gfsb4UNVttTnS5Hk, Model version=gemini-3.6-flash_high |
| Chess Puzzles(Epoch AI)Minimal | Minimal | 29.0% | — | Epoch AI | Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, chess_puzzles.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Gemini 3.6 Flash". effort is indicated by the suffix _minimal in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12.transcribed from tableSource excerptchess_puzzles.csv: Model version=gemini-3.6-flash_minimal, Best score (across scorers)=0.29, stderr=0.04560480215720686, Started at=2026-10-13T13:12:45.000ZLocation chess_puzzles.csv, data row 149 (file line 205), id=beSbPHiiWcwJBSzYRh7Kh4, Model version=gemini-3.6-flash_minimal |
| Chess Puzzles(Epoch AI)Low | Low | 42.0% | — | Epoch AI | Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, chess_puzzles.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Gemini 3.6 Flash". effort is indicated by the suffix _low in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12.transcribed from tableSource excerptchess_puzzles.csv: Model version=gemini-3.6-flash_low, Best score (across scorers)=0.42, stderr=0.04960449637488583, Started at=2026-10-13T13:12:52.000ZLocation chess_puzzles.csv, data row 148 (file line 204), id=hJ6XXLBm9yfXtSbbhWuwpw, Model version=gemini-3.6-flash_low |
| Chess Puzzles(Epoch AI)High | High | 40.0% | — | Epoch AI | Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, chess_puzzles.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Gemini 3.6 Flash". effort is indicated by the suffix _high in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12.transcribed from tableSource excerptchess_puzzles.csv: Model version=gemini-3.6-flash_high, Best score (across scorers)=0.4, stderr=0.0492365963917331, Started at=2026-10-13T13:14:52.000ZLocation chess_puzzles.csv, data row 140 (file line 196), id=ZDeGG5QYkdgVqzGPmmnbfx, Model version=gemini-3.6-flash_high |
| MirrorCodeHigh | High | 23.3% | — | Epoch AI | Epoch AI, Capabilities & benchmarking (benchmark_data.zip, mirrorcode.csv) CC BY 4.0third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | Run by Epoch AI (third-party measurement). Source label "Gemini 3.6 Flash". effort is indicated by the suffix _high in Epoch's Model version. Data retrieved 2026-11-12.transcribed from tableSource excerptmirrorcode.csv: Model version=gemini-3.6-flash_high, Best score (across scorers)=0.23333333333333334, stderr=0.09315175080076958, Started at=2026-10-21T16:48:28.000ZLocation mirrorcode.csv, data row 17 (file line 22), id=ftpz5JnywQdGtFDCHyjMt4, Model version=gemini-3.6-flash_high |
| Epoch Capabilities Index(ECI)not stated | not stated | 155.21 | — | Epoch AI | Epoch AI, epoch_capabilities_index/eci_scores.csv (CC BY 4.0)third-party · Retrieved 2026-11-12 | A per-model metric that combines results across multiple benchmarks and multiple efforts (not per effort). Calculated by Epoch AI.transcribed from tableSource excerpteci_scores.csv: Model=Gemini 3.6 Flash, eci=155.21, eci_ci_low=153.39, eci_ci_high=157.2Location epoch_capabilities_index/eci_scores.csv, data row 44 (file line 45), Model=Gemini 3.6 Flash |
| CharXiv Reasoning (with tools)not stated | not stated | 89.4% | — | Gemini 3.7 Flash model cardofficial · Retrieved 2026-11-13 | Vendor-reported value. Table in the Google model card. methodology PDF (deepmind.com/models/evals-methodology/gemini-3-7-flash): All of the results are run with the Gemini API ... with default sampling settings unless indicated otherwise. Gemini computed in-house; tools are search and code executiontranscribed from tableSource excerptWith tools | 89.4%Location Gemini 3.7 Flash model card Evaluation table, CharXiv Reasoning(With tools) row, Gemini 3.6 Flash column. In-house computation basis: methodology PDF, Multimodal / CharXiv Reasoning | |
| MRCR v2 (8-needle, 128k)not stated | not stated | 91.8% | — | Gemini 3.7 Flash model cardofficial · Retrieved 2026-11-13 | Vendor-reported value. Table in the Google model card. methodology PDF (deepmind.com/models/evals-methodology/gemini-3-7-flash): All of the results are run with the Gemini API ... with default sampling settings unless indicated otherwise. Computed in-house; cumulative score up to 128ktranscribed from tableSource excerptGDM-MRCR v2 (8-needle) Long context performance | 128k (average) | 91.8%Location Gemini 3.7 Flash model card Evaluation table, GDM-MRCR v2 (8-needle) 128k (average) row, Gemini 3.6 Flash column. In-house computation basis: methodology PDF, Long Context / GDM-MRCR v2 |
Related rankings
- Overall ranking (all models, records)
- Terminal-Bench 3.0 ranking by metric (all models, records)
- Terminal-Bench 2.1 ranking by metric (all models, records)
- HLE-Verified ranking by metric (all models, records)
- OSWorld 2.0 ranking by metric (all models, records)
- Agents' Last Exam (pass rate, version not stated) ranking by metric (all models, records)
- LABBench 2 ranking by metric (all models, records)
- LVBench ranking by metric (all models, records)
- GDP.PDF ranking by metric (all models, records)
- CharXiv Reasoning ranking by metric (all models, records)
- BioMysteryBench(Human Solvable) ranking by metric (all models, records)
- BioMysteryBench(Human Difficult) ranking by metric (all models, records)
- GPQA Diamond ranking by metric (all models, records)
- FrontierMath Tiers 1-3(v2) ranking by metric (all models, records)
- FrontierMath Tier 4(v2) ranking by metric (all models, records)
- OTIS Mock AIME 2024-2025 ranking by metric (all models, records)
- SimpleQA Verified ranking by metric (all models, records)
- Chess Puzzles(Epoch AI) ranking by metric (all models, records)
- MirrorCode ranking by metric (all models, records)
- Epoch Capabilities Index(ECI) ranking by metric (all models, records)
- CharXiv Reasoning (with tools) ranking by metric (all models, records)
- MRCR v2 (8-needle, 128k) ranking by metric (all models, records)
- Recommendations by role