WANDR(relaxed score)
WANDR relaxed score.
- Category
- Tool use
- Unit
- Percent (%)
- Higher is better
- Comparison groups
- 1total
- Currently available model rankings · Ranked results: 10
- All models (records): Groups: 1 · Entries: 15
Rankings
Values with different source types (official, third-party, paper) or measurement conditions cannot be compared, so rankings are separated by comparison group (the same source, or sources verified to use the same conditions).
Rankings include only models currently available in Claude Code / Codex, excluding legacy models.
- View on rankings page (by metric)
- Cost balance (frontier and effort changes)
- Overall ranking (performance first)
official results (Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2)
| Rank | Model | effort | Score | Source cost (metric) | measured/reported by | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Fable 5.2 | Max | 82.1% | $53.11Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "WANDR (relaxed score) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); WANDR: Claude was run with offline web search/fetch, programmatic tool calling, code execution, and a 980k token task budget (different from the Perplexity public configuration)Source excerptWANDR (relaxed score) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Fable 5.2 · Max: 82.1% $53.11" |
| 2 | Claude Fable 5.2 | Xhigh | 80.6% | $39.84Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "WANDR (relaxed score) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); WANDR: Claude was run with offline web search/fetch, programmatic tool calling, code execution, and a 980k token task budget (different from the Perplexity public configuration)Source excerptWANDR (relaxed score) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Fable 5.2 · Xhigh: 80.6% $39.84" |
| 3 | Claude Fable 5.2 | High | 79.3% | $29.20Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "WANDR (relaxed score) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); WANDR: Claude was run with offline web search/fetch, programmatic tool calling, code execution, and a 980k token task budget (different from the Perplexity public configuration)Source excerptWANDR (relaxed score) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Fable 5.2 · High: 79.3% $29.20" |
| 4 | Claude Fable 5.2 | Med | 73.6% | $15.71Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "WANDR (relaxed score) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); WANDR: Claude was run with offline web search/fetch, programmatic tool calling, code execution, and a 980k token task budget (different from the Perplexity public configuration)Source excerptWANDR (relaxed score) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Fable 5.2 · Med: 73.6% $15.71" |
| 5 | Claude Opus 5.5 | Max | 72.3% | $38.68Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "WANDR (relaxed score) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); WANDR: Claude was run with offline web search/fetch, programmatic tool calling, code execution, and a 980k token task budget (different from the Perplexity public configuration)Source excerptWANDR (relaxed score) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Opus 5.5 · Max: 72.3% $38.68" |
| 6 | Claude Fable 5.2 | Low | 71.4% | $12.66Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "WANDR (relaxed score) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); WANDR: Claude was run with offline web search/fetch, programmatic tool calling, code execution, and a 980k token task budget (different from the Perplexity public configuration)Source excerptWANDR (relaxed score) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Fable 5.2 · Low: 71.4% $12.66" |
| 7 | Claude Opus 5.5 | Xhigh | 71.3% | $29.25Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "WANDR (relaxed score) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); WANDR: Claude was run with offline web search/fetch, programmatic tool calling, code execution, and a 980k token task budget (different from the Perplexity public configuration)Source excerptWANDR (relaxed score) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Opus 5.5 · Xhigh: 71.3% $29.25" |
| 8 | Claude Opus 5.5 | High | 67.3% | $17.31Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "WANDR (relaxed score) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); WANDR: Claude was run with offline web search/fetch, programmatic tool calling, code execution, and a 980k token task budget (different from the Perplexity public configuration)Source excerptWANDR (relaxed score) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Opus 5.5 · High: 67.3% $17.31" |
| 9 | Claude Opus 5.5 | Med | 62.8% | $11.40Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "WANDR (relaxed score) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); WANDR: Claude was run with offline web search/fetch, programmatic tool calling, code execution, and a 980k token task budget (different from the Perplexity public configuration)Source excerptWANDR (relaxed score) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Opus 5.5 · Med: 62.8% $11.40" |
| 10 | Claude Opus 5.5 | Low | 31.2% | $1.25Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "WANDR (relaxed score) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); WANDR: Claude was run with offline web search/fetch, programmatic tool calling, code execution, and a 980k token task budget (different from the Perplexity public configuration)Source excerptWANDR (relaxed score) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Opus 5.5 · Low: 31.2% $1.25" |
All model rankings (records)
These rankings are recalculated by comparison group including legacy models and models unavailable in Claude Code / Codex. They differ from the rankings above because the set of models differs.
- View all model rankings (by metric)
- Cost balance (all models, records)
- Overall ranking (all models, records)
Show rankings including legacy and unavailable models (entries: 15)
official results (Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2)
| Rank | Model | effort | Score | Source cost (metric) | measured/reported by | source |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Claude Fable 5.2 | Max | 82.1% | $53.11Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "WANDR (relaxed score) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); WANDR: Claude was run with offline web search/fetch, programmatic tool calling, code execution, and a 980k token task budget (different from the Perplexity public configuration)Source excerptWANDR (relaxed score) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Fable 5.2 · Max: 82.1% $53.11" |
| 2 | Claude Fable 5.2 | Xhigh | 80.6% | $39.84Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "WANDR (relaxed score) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); WANDR: Claude was run with offline web search/fetch, programmatic tool calling, code execution, and a 980k token task budget (different from the Perplexity public configuration)Source excerptWANDR (relaxed score) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Fable 5.2 · Xhigh: 80.6% $39.84" |
| 3 | Claude Fable 5.2 | High | 79.3% | $29.20Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "WANDR (relaxed score) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); WANDR: Claude was run with offline web search/fetch, programmatic tool calling, code execution, and a 980k token task budget (different from the Perplexity public configuration)Source excerptWANDR (relaxed score) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Fable 5.2 · High: 79.3% $29.20" |
| 4 | Claude Fable 5.2 | Med | 73.6% | $15.71Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "WANDR (relaxed score) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); WANDR: Claude was run with offline web search/fetch, programmatic tool calling, code execution, and a 980k token task budget (different from the Perplexity public configuration)Source excerptWANDR (relaxed score) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Fable 5.2 · Med: 73.6% $15.71" |
| 5 | Claude Opus 5.5 | Max | 72.3% | $38.68Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "WANDR (relaxed score) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); WANDR: Claude was run with offline web search/fetch, programmatic tool calling, code execution, and a 980k token task budget (different from the Perplexity public configuration)Source excerptWANDR (relaxed score) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Opus 5.5 · Max: 72.3% $38.68" |
| 6 | Claude Fable 5.2 | Low | 71.4% | $12.66Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "WANDR (relaxed score) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); WANDR: Claude was run with offline web search/fetch, programmatic tool calling, code execution, and a 980k token task budget (different from the Perplexity public configuration)Source excerptWANDR (relaxed score) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Fable 5.2 · Low: 71.4% $12.66" |
| 7 | Claude Opus 5.5 | Xhigh | 71.3% | $29.25Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "WANDR (relaxed score) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); WANDR: Claude was run with offline web search/fetch, programmatic tool calling, code execution, and a 980k token task budget (different from the Perplexity public configuration)Source excerptWANDR (relaxed score) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Opus 5.5 · Xhigh: 71.3% $29.25" |
| 8 | Claude Fable 5.1 | Max | 68.7% | $51.10Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "WANDR (relaxed score) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); WANDR: Claude was run with offline web search/fetch, programmatic tool calling, code execution, and a 980k token task budget (different from the Perplexity public configuration)Source excerptWANDR (relaxed score) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Fable 5.1 · Max: 68.7% $51.10" |
| 9 | Claude Fable 5.1 | Xhigh | 67.7% | $44.50Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "WANDR (relaxed score) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); WANDR: Claude was run with offline web search/fetch, programmatic tool calling, code execution, and a 980k token task budget (different from the Perplexity public configuration)Source excerptWANDR (relaxed score) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Fable 5.1 · Xhigh: 67.7% $44.50" |
| 10 | Claude Opus 5.5 | High | 67.3% | $17.31Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "WANDR (relaxed score) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); WANDR: Claude was run with offline web search/fetch, programmatic tool calling, code execution, and a 980k token task budget (different from the Perplexity public configuration)Source excerptWANDR (relaxed score) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Opus 5.5 · High: 67.3% $17.31" |
| 11 | Claude Fable 5.1 | High | 66.7% | $37.60Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "WANDR (relaxed score) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); WANDR: Claude was run with offline web search/fetch, programmatic tool calling, code execution, and a 980k token task budget (different from the Perplexity public configuration)Source excerptWANDR (relaxed score) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Fable 5.1 · High: 66.7% $37.60" |
| 12 | Claude Fable 5.1 | Med | 64.5% | $28.78Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "WANDR (relaxed score) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); WANDR: Claude was run with offline web search/fetch, programmatic tool calling, code execution, and a 980k token task budget (different from the Perplexity public configuration)Source excerptWANDR (relaxed score) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Fable 5.1 · Med: 64.5% $28.78" |
| 13 | Claude Fable 5.1 | Low | 63.3% | $24.41Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "WANDR (relaxed score) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); WANDR: Claude was run with offline web search/fetch, programmatic tool calling, code execution, and a 980k token task budget (different from the Perplexity public configuration)Source excerptWANDR (relaxed score) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Fable 5.1 · Low: 63.3% $24.41" |
| 14 | Claude Opus 5.5 | Med | 62.8% | $11.40Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "WANDR (relaxed score) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); WANDR: Claude was run with offline web search/fetch, programmatic tool calling, code execution, and a 980k token task budget (different from the Perplexity public configuration)Source excerptWANDR (relaxed score) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Opus 5.5 · Med: 62.8% $11.40" |
| 15 | Claude Opus 5.5 | Low | 31.2% | $1.25Cost per attempt | Anthropic | Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. A point in the figure "WANDR (relaxed score) / Accuracy vs. cost" on the Anthropic announcement page. values were taken from each point's aria-label (DOM); the page shows them only in the figure; value for its own model (announced by Anthropic); WANDR: Claude was run with offline web search/fetch, programmatic tool calling, code execution, and a 980k token task budget (different from the Perplexity public configuration)Source excerptWANDR (relaxed score) — Accuracy vs. cost: "Opus 5.5 · Low: 31.2% $1.25" |