Remote Labor Index(RLI)

A metric measuring performance on remote work tasks.

Category
Knowledge
Unit
Percent (%)
Higher is better
Comparison groups
1total
Currently available model rankings · Ranked results: 3
All models (records): Groups: 1 · Entries: 4

Rankings

Values with different source types (official, third-party, paper) or measurement conditions cannot be compared, so rankings are separated by comparison group (the same source, or sources verified to use the same conditions).

Rankings include only models currently available in Claude Code / Codex, excluding legacy models.

official results (Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2)

RankModeleffortScoreSource cost (metric)measured/reported bysource
1Claude Fable 5.2High41.3%—AnthropicIntroducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. table note: Scores for Fable 5.2, Fable 5.1, and Opus 5.5 show results with safeguards on unless otherwise noted. All scores show each model’s highest-available effort unless otherwise noted.
Source excerpt41.3%Location Table, Remote Labor Index (RLI) row: 41.3 high
2Claude Opus 5.5not stated21.3%—AnthropicIntroducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. table note: Scores for Fable 5.2, Fable 5.1, and Opus 5.5 show results with safeguards on unless otherwise noted. All scores show each model’s highest-available effort unless otherwise noted.
Source excerpt21.3%Location Table, Remote Labor Index (RLI) row: 21.3
3GPT-6 Astranot stated20.8%—not statedIntroducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. table note: Scores for Fable 5.2, Fable 5.1, and Opus 5.5 show results with safeguards on unless otherwise noted. All scores show each model’s highest-available effort unless otherwise noted. Values for other vendor models (as listed by Anthropic).
Source excerpt20.8%Location Table, Remote Labor Index (RLI) row: 20.8

All model rankings (records)

These rankings are recalculated by comparison group including legacy models and models unavailable in Claude Code / Codex. They differ from the rankings above because the set of models differs.

Show rankings including legacy and unavailable models (entries: 4)

official results (Introducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2)

RankModeleffortScoreSource cost (metric)measured/reported bysource
1Claude Fable 5.2High41.3%—AnthropicIntroducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. table note: Scores for Fable 5.2, Fable 5.1, and Opus 5.5 show results with safeguards on unless otherwise noted. All scores show each model’s highest-available effort unless otherwise noted.
Source excerpt41.3%Location Table, Remote Labor Index (RLI) row: 41.3 high
2Claude Opus 5.5not stated21.3%—AnthropicIntroducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. table note: Scores for Fable 5.2, Fable 5.1, and Opus 5.5 show results with safeguards on unless otherwise noted. All scores show each model’s highest-available effort unless otherwise noted.
Source excerpt21.3%Location Table, Remote Labor Index (RLI) row: 21.3
3GPT-6 Astranot stated20.8%—not statedIntroducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. table note: Scores for Fable 5.2, Fable 5.1, and Opus 5.5 show results with safeguards on unless otherwise noted. All scores show each model’s highest-available effort unless otherwise noted. Values for other vendor models (as listed by Anthropic).
Source excerpt20.8%Location Table, Remote Labor Index (RLI) row: 20.8
4Claude Fable 5.1not stated17.9%—AnthropicIntroducing Claude Fable 5.2 and Claude Mythos 5.2Retrieved 2026-11-12 · Vendor-reported value. table note: Scores for Fable 5.2, Fable 5.1, and Opus 5.5 show results with safeguards on unless otherwise noted. All scores show each model’s highest-available effort unless otherwise noted.
Source excerpt17.9%Location Table, Remote Labor Index (RLI) row: 17.9